Study: Aspirin slashes hereditary cancer risk
28 October 2011, Friday / REUTERS, LONDON

For the general population, taking low-dose aspirin might be a more
sensible option. (Photo: Cihan)
Taking two aspirin a day for two years reduces the
long-term risk of bowel cancer in people with a family history of
the disease by around 60 percent, according to a British study
published on Friday.
The finding could also have implications for the wider population,
though more research is needed to determine an ideal dose for
different groups of people.
In recent years there has been an intense debate about the merits
of routinely taking aspirin, which increases the risk of stomach
ulcers and internal bleeding, but also protects against heart
problems.
John Burn of Newcastle University believes his study -- the first
randomised controlled trial into the effect of aspirin on cancer
outcomes -- is a key piece of evidence validating the case for
aspirin.
Previous research into cancer and aspirin, a cheap drug originally
developed by Bayer more than a century ago, has been based on less
robust observational studies.
Burn's study looked at people with Lynch syndrome, a genetic
condition predisposing them to a range of cancers. It affects at
least one in 1,000 people and around half of them develop cancer,
mainly in the bowel and womb.
His data suggests that for every 10,000 cancers prevented, there
could be 1,000 extra ulcers due to aspirin.
"There's a trade-off. If we could get by on a smaller dose, then we
could potentially avoid a lot of those ulcers," Burn told a news
conference.
For the general population, taking low-dose aspirin might be a more
sensible option, and a major new multi-dose trial should shed more
light on this in the next few years, he added.
Burn and colleagues studied 861 people with Lynch syndrome, who
began a two-year course of either 600 milligrams a day of aspirin
or a placebo between 1999 and 2005.
An initial analysis in 2007 found no difference in cancer rates
between the groups. But it turned out the effect was delayed and in
2010 there was a clear divergence, with 19 new bowel cancers among
those on aspirin and 34 in the placebo arm.
What is more, among those patients who stuck to the full two-year
regimen of pill-taking -- some 60 percent of the total -- the
effects were more pronounced, and strongly statistically
significant, with a 63 percent reduction in bowel cancer cases from
23 in the placebo group versus 10 in the aspirin group.
"What we have finally shown is that aspirin has a major
preventative effect on cancer but this doesn't become apparent
until years later," Burn said.
How exactly aspirin provides protection is unclear, but Burn said
the delayed effect suggested aspirin may hit faulty stem cells
before they mutate into pre-cancerous cells.
The study, which was published online by the Lancet medical journal
and part-funded by Bayer, also found some evidence of a reduction
in other solid cancers linked to Lynch syndrome.
"This is a really important study showing that aspirin can
significantly reduce the risk of bowel and other cancers in
patients genetically at high risk of developing cancer," said Chris
Paraskeva of the University of Bristol, who was not involved in the
research.
In a commentary in the Lancet, Andrew Chan of Harvard Medical and
Scott Lippman of the MD Anderson Cancer Center in Houston said the
findings were "compelling" and arguably supported more general
recommendations to consider aspirin for preventing bowel cancer,
based on individual patients' risks.