Customer-Vendor relationship : Who got the power and
say?
1. Sitoh runs the Town Council -
Customer
2. EM Services engaged to run the Town Council -
Vendor
3. Sitoh is a MP
Conclusion: Sitoh as a customer and MP has
the power to say and decide. Unless he is being micro-manage by his
vendor (EM Services) which is very unlikely.
As a MP and a customer to EM Services, if he were
to pass a statement saying that he want all the current staffs to
remains....there are nothing EM Services can say. But should EM
Services able to rebut and counter his statement...now that is
pathetic! You are not even respected by your vendors.
Transition
1. Company A buy Company B
2. Company A will acknowledge and absorb Company
B staffs, profit, losses, cost etc
3. Unwanted staffs will be compensated with
standard industrial package
4. Retained staffs contribution, ie leaves
entitlement, years of service will be acknowledge and
recognized.
Conclusion: You want your salary to match the
corporate standard, then you have to following the "standard
market" when it comes to compensation?
By termination their services and handed them an
application form meaning they are losing their years of service and
all the gained benefits from it. And even if they are re-employed
the first impact - they may be offered less than their current
salary, will received a pro-rated increment and bonuses as they
have not complete a 1 cycle year of employment. Do your calculation
in 5 and 10 years down the road, the possible loss to individual
and the gain/saved by EM services.
This is a bad tactic which normally practice by
"Cannot Eat - Die Die Must Eat" kinda organisation.
10 - 20 years ago..you say "A" the people will
reply "AAaaaaaa"
Today you say "A"...you will be questioned Caps
or Small? Arial or New Times Roman? Bold? Italic?
Underline? Font size?
