Workers can expect better pay rise: labour
chief
By Evelyn Choo | Posted: 22 July 2010 1945
hrs
So long as our Ministers remain paid proportional to the highest
8 earners in the 6 best paid professions, the life of Singaporeans
can never be expected to be too good.
This is because then Ministers would be much too pro business,
sharing the same mercenary (profit at all costs- i.e. Profit Above
Principle/ 'PAP') ideals as CEOs are oft accused of.
We all know that for most part, a CEO's key KPIs are that of
company profitability- which is what essentially determines their
salaries. Thus said, it would be better if PAP could find a better
way of pegging ministerial salaries factoring in the
median of all Singaporean's salaries (possibly
including those overseas)- whilst making these calculations
transparent.
Though such a new calculation would result in relatively lower
salaries then the currently overheated PAP determined ones, a new
scheme would go far in convincing all Singaporeans that their
leaders are not like any other exploitative CEO (recall many an
irresponsible banker CEOs, BP CEO Hayward etc- whose profit minded
objectives oft compromise the integrity of society at large, are
accused of overworking and under paying workers, polluting the env.
etc) but are citizen's true chosen leaders, not exploiters of
Singaporean labour but leaders trusted by all to maintain social
stability and economic progress, especially for our future
generations; - unlike notorious CEOs whose companies are not just
bankrupt but also require government bailouts to avoid 'spillover
effects'.
What better election show of a good character is there but but
frugality on part of a leader, as our nation weathers crisis after
crisis.
Whilst SG is unique in many ways, we are not immune to natural
limits e.g: "Whatever we do when we get extraordinary rains like we
had recently, no amount of engineering can prevent flooding...
unless you want to lose half the roads and have canals." ~ MM Lee,
ST 22July 2010 [link].
Novel as our Ministerial salary schemes may be, nature and logic
dictates that Corrupt officials would be corrupt, no matter how
much they are paid, how sustainable is it for SG to pay our Ministers not to be corrupt?
The most true and talented Singaporeans, especially those not out
to earn a quick buck would then feel comfortable either in civil
service or in government and Singaporeans wouldn't be unreasonable
in their expectations of their leaders so long as they feel that
all are in it together and for the long term.
For most, an excessive pay doesn't confer much quality-of-life
improvement. In anycase, for the really talented, surely they would
be able to earn a comfortable living post retirement having done
well in government service, as public speech requests and book
sales would only be one too many. Without the title of 'Minister
Mentor/ Senior Minister' the impact of their opinions about society
would be equally resounding, no matter what appointment prefix they
have.
As for those whose esteem is so dependent on the size of their
salary, let them foray into the focused world of business. In the
midst of a committed government elected by a wise and knowledgeable
populace, they would find politicians then hard to bribe. May that
be the national future we can proudly all look forward to.
References:
- [AFP22Jul2010]: 'Flood response not sufficient: Lee Kuan Yew':
"Whatever we do when we get extraordinary rains like we had
recently, no amount of engineering can prevent flooding... unless
you want to lose half the roads and have canals." [link].
- [Reuters5Apr2007]: 'Singapore ministers set for million-dollar
pay hike': "'If we don't do that ... corruption will set in and we
will become like many other countries,' Defence Minister Teo Chee
Hean was quoted as saying in the Straits Times last week."-
[link]
- [CNA:03May2006] 'Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong says Singapore is
at the top of its game because of a strong political system and
quality leadership' [YouTube/@1m10s]

