Defiant YPAP leader and new citizen from India Mr Sinha Shekhar has
threatened to sue a netizen who lodged a complaint against him to
HDB for “slander”.
Mr Sinha Shekhar sparked a massive outcry in cyberspace lately when
he revealed on the REACH Facebook that he owns both a condominium
and HDB resale flat which he rented out, prompting one netizen
“kojakBT” to write in to HDB questioning if Mr Sinha has
contravened any HDB rules in doing so.
HDB has since cleared Mr Sinha Shekhar of any wrongdoing, but he
remained bitter and upset in an interview with Straits Times.
Mr Sinha Shekhar said he “found it unfair that a faceless and
nameless netizen could catalyse an investigation into his property
dealings,” a lame argument used repeatedly by the PAP to discredit
its critics in cyberspace.
“If I want to sue this guy (KojakBT) for slander, will HDB
give me his details? They can’t!” he whined.
How kojakBT has slandered the thin-skinned Mr Sinha Shekhar is
anybody’s guess when all he did was to ask HDB to investigate the
matter.
Unlike Mr Sinha Shekhar, “kojakBT” is a Singapore citizen who has
served two and a half years of National Service and has
reservist obligations as well.
A poster-boy of the YPAP, Mr Sinha Shekhar who has NEVER served a
single day of National Service in his entire life, may end up
standing for elections in the future under the banner of the
pro-foreigner PAP, or rather FAP (Foreigner Action Party).
As a prominent leader of the Youth Wing of Singapore’s ruling
party, it is disappointing that Mr Sinha Shekhar has picked up the
bad habits of the senior leaders of suing their critics and
opponents as and when they please.
Mr Sinha Shekhar is notorious in Singapore blogosphere for his
description of PAP critics as “dogs” on the YPAP
Facebook. Ironically, he was later given an
“Outstanding Contributors’ award” by Prime
Minister Lee Hsien Loong in person for the regularity of his
contributions on the PAP REACH Forum and Facebook.
[Source: YPAP Facebook]
For some strange reasons, YPAP Chairman Teo Ser Luck has remained
silent on his fellow activist’s outburst against Singaporeans who
dare disagree with the PAP’s policies, an indication that he
endorsed the harsh language used by Mr Sinha Shekhar.
The PAP has been actively courting PRs and new citizens like Mr
Sinha Shekhar to boost its flagging support base.
The next election may be the last opportunity for true-blue native
Singaporeans to reclaim ownership of Singapore after which
they will surely be relegated to being second-class minorities in
their own country of birth led, controlled and dominated by new
citizens born elsewhere like Mr Sinha Shekhar to perpetuate the
PAP’s political hegemony forever.
ok so guys...what do u think? i personally think he is a fool of a
politician to commit such blunders such as threaten to sue the
whistle blower. so now reporting against unlawful practices or
suspected unlawful practices are disallowed if ur from PAP? I
believe he has to understand that being in an appointee of a
political group makes u a somewhat public figure and thus u are
open to public scrutiny. if leaders in social services like Kong
Hee has been questioned, then why would he be anyway immune to
public scrutiny.. since HDB has found him not guilty of any wrong
doing...then what is there to be flustered about? why is there the
sudden urge to sue the one who did his civic duty in pointing
potential arrears.
i think the whistle blower is a true citizen.He has the guts to
blow whistles when suspected wrong doing is present...if one is not
willing to point out areas that the country could be having
problems..starting from our politicians and future leaders, then we
are not patriotic enough...we are ostriches who bury our heads in
the sands and claim everything is alrite... the public has the
right to know if we have leaders like this who think themselves
high and mighty and living in a high tower without even knowing the
situation on the ground... gone were the old guard who fought to
build this country....all that is left are now this kinda
politicians? then we are in deep trouble... then we should have the
moral courage to reject this kinda politicians...we should at least
have our politicians continue to show the integrity of the old
guard like they did...not having to threaten to sue left and
right... if u are flustered and wanting to sue...it only gives the
image...that ur defensive and have something to hide...or does
he?
