The case of relief cabby Mr Teo Kian Seng, who was charged in
court yesterday for “threatening” PAP MP Lee Yi Shyan had sparked
an outcry in cyberspace with many netizens wondering why the MP
felt fit to make a police report in the first place.
Mr Teo allegedly told Lee in Mandarin that he hoped “history
will not repeat itself” in a referral to the torching incident
involving PAP MP Seng Han Thong last year at a Meet-the-People
session on 1st of March.
It was reported in the Straits Times today that Mr Teo had gone
to see Lee over a summons received by his mother for leaving
clutter along the corridor of her flat.
Mr Teo’s mother, who is currently in her 80s, has been working
as a “Garang-guni” woman for many years in order to pay for her
medical expenses.
She might have no choice but to leave her “barang” along the
corridor due to the nature of her work and lack of space in her own
home.
It is not unusual in first world Singapore to see the elderly
scavenging for used cardboards and newspapers in the streets for a
living.
Despite its huge foreign reserves, Singapore has few social
safety nets for its citizens who are expected to be self-reliant
and not depend on the state for support.
It is not known if Mr Teo is the sole bread-winner of the family
and if his mother will be in financial distress should he go to
jail.
The Straits Times reported
that Assistant Superintendent Raj Kishore Rai had told District
Judge Low Wee Ping that “the prosecution was not ready to accept
Teo’s plea as the victim was an MP.”
Why should an MP deserve preferential treatment from the
police?
The authorities should assess the likelihood of Mr Teo acting on
his very subtle threat thoroughly before taking action against
him.
He probably said it in the heat of a moment under some sort of
“provocation”.
The odds are stacked heavily against Mr Teo who does not have
the financial resources to afford a good lawyer to fight the case
for him, not to mention the financial losses he has to suffer as a
result.
Source: Temasek Review
Wah, police actually said cannot accept plea because victim is
MP? 