Some seek
PR status only to get hands on CPF savings
Mon, May
31, 2010
my paper
LAST
Saturday, I was upset by a former colleague who had relinquished
his permanent-resident (PR) status in
Singapore.
He bade me farewell, saying: "I am
going back to the Philippines to retire. I cashed out all my CPF
(Central Provident Fund) savings but I will come back, as a
tourist."
He showed me photos of his new home
in the Philippines, renovated luxuriously and comparable to a Good
Class Bungalow here.
His attitude made me
see red.
Have we taken
measures to ensure that only people who genuinely want to settle
down in Singapore and contribute to the nation's economic growth
are made PRs?
I work in
human resources, and some of my foreign colleagues who earn less than $2,500 monthly are
PRs.
Almost all
the foreigners in my workplace are vying for PR status. Some do so
because the mandatory contributions to their CPF accounts result in
savings which they can take out when they decide to
leave.
For new PRs, the CPF
contribution rates are graduated, but they get full rates from the
third year onwards (the same contribution rates as
Singaporeans).
Perhaps the CPF
Board should revise the contribution rates for PRs to make it less
attractive for those who want the status only for the CPF
savings.
Foreigners who have become PRs find
it easier to apply for jobs in Singapore, compared to those who are
on employment passes.
PR status aside, are
employers providing fair employment opportunities to
Singaporeans?
Are graduates from
Singapore universities not comparable to graduates from foreign
universities, such as those in the Philippines, China, Myanmar,
Hong Kong and Indonesia?
Before employers
decide to hire a foreigner, have they exhausted all reasonable
recruitment options in Singapore first?
It is a myth that
foreigners have lower salary expectations than
Singaporeans.
Of the
foreigners who graduated from a university in their home country,
the majority whom I have met and interviewed expect much higher salaries than, or
salaries comparable to, what a Singaporean with a good local degree
would get.
Their reasons include having to pay
rental fees and utility bills, to remit money to their families and
to pay for their children's education in their home
country.
But Singaporeans
also have similar burdens: mortgage payments, utility bills,
children's education fees, as well as a sum of money to be put
aside for elders as a form of filial piety.
Besides, a
foreigner's salary could turn out to be quite a substantial sum
after currency conversion.
I hope that
employers will provide employment opportunities to Singaporeans
before considering foreigners.
MRS ANNA
LEE
http://www.asiaone.com/News/AsiaOne+News/Singapore/Story/A1Story20100531-219249.html