Bringing reference to the former 'rugby fiasco' incident
reported in the Straits times a few weeks ago. 80% of the articles
were all lies and utter bullshit.
1. St Andrews and ACS Supporters did not fight
2. Leonard Wee didn't point the middle finger or scold insults
about Daniel's mother
3. There was no big brawl whatsoever, just a scuffle between a
few players
4. The referee was constantly taunted by St Andrews Supporters
and parents after the match (stated in his official match
report)
5. Somewhere through the middle of the second half, A St Andrews
Rugger tackled a ACS rugger down the sideline off the field into St
Andrew Supporters. the Supporters were seen kicking the ACS Rugger
who was on the floor. (Stated in his official match report)
6. Straits Times is not bias to ACS, it just used whatever
information it had (and obviously did not verify if it was right or
wrong) and put it onto national newspapers. Making a mountain of
the Molehill
7. Leonard Wee's Mother had every right to report to the police.
If someone hit your son in the face intentionally, you would quite
obviously be angry and report the incident.
8. The 2 boys assaulted outside the Old Police Academy at a
bus stop did not taunt the St Andrews Sec 4 student in civilian
clothes at all but were punched, slapped and spitted on. However,
they stood their ground and did not retaliate.
Because of the Straits Times Reports, both School's
reputations have been tarnished. I do feel a sense of shame that a
National Newspaper has done such a thing.
no.. one.. gives.. a.. rat's... ass..
