Basically, the court throught the finding and evidence can
justify the cause of innocent, Asian court procceed in a way
different from the west where a jurdiciary committee is
form from all walk of innocent life within that community. In
Asia, the judge or magistrate appointed by the state make the
final decision. In Singapore, a fair trial exist to determine an
innocent person who can appeal all the way up to the president.
In most part of asia, just like malaysia, if you notice the
way the police handle drug couriers or robbers, they shot on the
spot, and news will report that the criminals shot at police,
because to the malaysian govt this are usless bums, why waste time
in court and all those tax payer money and time in court just to
arrive at a death penalty, they kill them once and for all...and in
China, same kill their criminal on the spot, and even if go court,
you got nobody to protect you, just a simple trial and you go to
the firing squad on the same day as the day they sentence you to
death.
Drugs can turn a society into havoc, cripple the society and end
up depending on it, it is in this view that a death penalty is
neccessary. This is not something you dunno or you dun get it, to
be fair, before you visit asian countries, you should know the
rules and regulation on drug trafficking. And even with death
penalty stick on it, peoples are still doing it, trading their
lifes for it, just imagine if there is no death penalty, what will
happen to society of Asia country, do remember that the opium had
destroyed the fabric of asia by the west, do you want them to
manipulate us again.
Amnesty should look this as a postively, for our
youngs and society, they should be more focus on poor
and dictatorised countries that lack the freedom of expression
and representation.