Even when the Taiwanese 'hum' attempt to be serious with its
expanded homilies - it is nothing but filled with ill conceived
verbiage, that only a useless Mushroom from Oxford will attempt to
crystallize the stooooopidity of the 'hum' from Taiwan - and
declare its admiration to the verbiage from the
resident 'hum'
The dumb parasitical Mushroom from Oxford showering
its infatuation to the resident Taiwanese 'hum' will surely
make them a remarkable odd couple.
Dear ah Wm,
I understand your concern, as i said earlier, we singaporeans,
the society and economy had reached a point of diminishing Marginal
utility, meaning that we are overestimated ourselves, overpaid
ourselves and over spoonfeeded ourselves that we had reach a point
of thinking that we must be paid a higher salary in comparing to
the cost of living, that is exactly what is happening in Japan, as
such that for decades, they cannot turn up their economy because
peoples refused to have competitive wage system adhered to a global
market, and eventually even their own MNCs had moved out. We have
to remember competitive in our wage flexibility, otherwise, as an
industrial dependent country without any natural resources beside
some rambutans, we would be history if we continuing to have a
rigid wage structure of getting high and higher paid without
knowing that the global market is not that much.
What possibly has driven the Taiwanese hum to declare
Singapore "society and economy had reached a point of
diminishing Marginal utility" ?
It is amazing that the hare-brained Mushroom from Oxford will
accept the Taiwanese 'hum' interpretation that 'diminishing
Marginal utility' means - "we are overestimated ourselves,
overpaid ourselves and over spoonfeeded ourselves that we had reach
a point of thinking that we must be paid a higher salary in
comparing to the cost of living," .....
Shocking.
Has Singaporeans "over-estimated ourselves, overpaid
ourselves, and over spoonfed ourselves" ?
How could this happen when Singaporeans have no say about
wages to match the Cost of Living - and when industrial strikes are
unheard of in Singapore ?
Has it not been the case that the NWC has determined
wages and wage increases - and the supposed Tripartite
Agreements are heavily influenced and controlled by the
PAP - with one seat representing Government, another seat by
the PAP controlled NTUC and the third by the Employers'
Federation ?
The cost of living is well within the control and influence of
the PAP Government that arbitrarily manipulate and authorise all
price increases in Singapore - and this will
include:- utilities, transportation, taxes, COE, ERP, land
sales prices, stamp duties, development charges, public housing,
bank interests rates.
Only the dumb parasitical Mushroom from Oxford will succour
on the stoooopidity of the Taiwanee 'hum' to accept the Taiwanese
'hum' bald and baseless statement that Japan's situation is
due to the Japanese citizens refusal to accept lower wages to make
themselves more competitive against the World.
Why will the Taiwanese 'hum' not appreciate the Japanese
problems by looking at the same situation in
Singapore ?
Has it not been the case - where the PAP Government
has also refused to lower public housing prices in 2008 and
2009 - so as NOT to rock the foundations of the banking system
that has been financing the HIGH Prices of Public Housing sold in
the boom years in the early 1990s - resulting in Singaporeans
being 'asset rich, but cash poor' when reaching retirement age
?
Is this not the same in Japan, where the Japanese government
cannot suddenly make a U-Turn in wage levels, and restructure
industries to that of the 1950s - to get full employment ?
When the bubble has been blown so big, can it be deflated safely
without causing a sudden deflation - which the Japanese government
has been attempting for the last 10 years ?
What garbage homily is the Taiwanese 'hum' spreading in the big
lump written ?
As i said again, in term of social economy, we also have to look
at the society as a whole, we are in a diminishing birthrate and
aging population, with less young in the market and more old
leaving the market, the funnel had tilted upside down, previous
being 10 youngs support 2 olds, now it is almost 5 youngs support 5
olds and in 10 years time it will be 2 youngs supporting 10 olds
who are no more contributing to the economy. It will be a heavy
burden on these youngs which i am also one of them. You may be
right that we are not attracting first class talent here, and
certainly not singaporean like your type of class here, but our
population is at stake in near future, do you understand that in
the first place??? Aren't we too selfish to let our youngs suffer
later. And do you think the govt like to implement unpopular
policies such as allow more immigrant in,...there is simply no
choice. Govt dun mind call all foreigners go back and win a big
margin election votes, but they take their chance, because they
know the consquences of a diminishing population, by which
singapore economy depend on it. Human resource.
"Aren't we too selfish to let our youngs suffer later."
- is the Taiwanese 'hum' making an attempt to justify for the
opening of the floodgates for more foreigners to enter Singapore
?
What has been the cause for population decline in Singapore
despite all the supposed incentives given by the PAP Government to
encourage a higher birthrate ?
Should Singaporeans not hold the PAP Government to be
accountable for the present predicament that Singapore is facing
?
Despite the larger land mass and low population, Sweden is not
depending on low wage to find their own existence in the global
economic competition, and are mindful to control immigrant flows to
prevent lowering of their own Standard of Living.
Why has it not been considered that despite the high tax
environment in Sweden - the Swedish population has seen a steady
growth in their birth rate since Year 2000 ?
What is it that the Swedish Government has done correctly to
encourage growth in the birth rates that the Singapore
cannot acheive - despite all the supposed intelligent that
draws the World Highest Wages as Ministers ?
Changes and adjustment is never going to be easy, i understand
that, going overseas are not for bosses, it is usually those lower
in rank such as you, sg accountants are in great demand in China,
why? because sg accountants are consider clean. That is your
advantage, but dun take it so lightly, as you rightly put it,
indian accountant are on the rise, but luckily, Chinese dun like
indian, so Sing goes to China, Indian come to Sg. Nevertheless,
like it or not, it is a global market, it is good actually for you
or your friend to see for themselves how worthy is an accountant in
a global market, from there you guys set your priorty, if you have
been spending lavishly, think twice, santa claus days are over. You
have market yourself, given you at your heyday of your career
facing such problem, by the time we, the young ones come into the
market, we would had prepared ourselves and knows our value.
Therefore, for you and your friend, they need to adjust to the
market a global market not just simply a Singapore market.
Why will the Taiwanese 'hum' only limit its useless homily
on the Singaporean workers alone to venture overseas ?
Why will the Taiwanese 'hum' claim that "going overseas are
not for bosses" ?
It is typical selfish shrewdness of a Taiwanese that makes such
a statement to be hypocritical, when her own father is the boss and
have travelled overseas to make all the investments that the
Taiwanese 'hum' has the loud mouth to claim in this forum.
The fact that the Chinese enterprises accept accountants
from Singapore - Chinese or otherwise - and not Indians from India,
is largely due to the simple fact that most Singaporeans have a
working ability to speak and perhaps write Mandarin.
It has nothing to do with honesty of Singaporeans - as it is
more to do with Personal Professionalism in the occupation which
any individual is to be held accountable.
The other reason for Chinese enterprise looking to Singapore for
accounting skill is due to the fact that the UK Accounting System
is gaining a foothold in Communist China - as it is gaining
acceptance in Communist Vietnam.
Both of these countries have only known Communist system and
find the UK ACCA methods to be more efficient and pragmatic to
implement for a modern economy.
As much as it is important for individual Singaporeans to be
prepared to travel overseas, it is even more essential for
Singaporean bosses to go to - so as to spread the Singapore wing to
compete more effectively in every territory.
One can only be suspcious of the Taiwanese 'hum' intention to
limit the spread of our wings and move further to have more depth
for our economy.
Amazing that it will show itself to be a fervent carpet beggar
to LKY and the PAP.
Simply put it, as a boss, if an indian can delivery me a good
accounting report and settle the auditors, i dun mind employing him
at a lower rate than a Singaporeans, this tell you that the society
as a whole, professionals are not peoples who can command a high
paid, but simply a mere worker as any other working class. When you
go US or british or aussie to find jobs, you dun demand alots
because you want to be competitive with the locals there, you
get the jobs, so the Aussies, Brits and Americans are facing
the same problem, but are they complaining, no, because they
understand what is globalisation, a bounderless economy and labour
which they created.
The Taiwanese 'hum' - is clearly a pseudo-Singaporean
- when it will employ a cheaper foreign labor to keep its accounts,
even when a loyal fellow Singaporean can perform the job.
Obviously, the Taiwanese 'hum' has much skeletons to hide in its
operating accounts - and will need an Indian to help it settle any
troublesome queries from the IRS.
The Taiwanese 'hum' is not attempting to destroy the very
structure of an orderly Singapore Society - when it will state that
"professionals are not people who can command a high paid, but
simply a mere worker as any other working class".
Is the Taiwanese 'hum' treating Singaporean Doctors, Lawyers,
Engineers, Architects and all such PROFESSIONALS as ordinary
workers ?
Obviously, the Taiwanese 'hum' familiarity with the oridinary
professional prostitutes as working class will lead to her
confusion over the term "Professional" - and it is amazing that the
supposed professional from Oxford has no qualm to dissect the
stooooopidity of the verbiage homily from the resident Taiwanese
'hum'.
It is very obvious that the parasitical Mushroom from
Oxford is infatuated with the whiff leaked from the Taiwanese 'hum'
and has lost its ability to be more circumspect with such a
childish piece of garbage.
It is better for the Taiwanese 'hum' to stay out of Singapore
Politics and do not attempt to spread its stooooopitiy in this
forum.
Get out of Singapore - and stay out.
