ALL Singapore is interested in
is to SHOW THE WORLD AT LARGE what a beautiful place it is AT THE
EXPENSE of the poor and homeless.
Joshua Chiang / Andrew Loh
They have been camped out there for months, but no one from the
government agencies seem to have known about them – perhaps until
The Online Citizen’s report on 13 January.
TOC had reported that some 15 homeless families were camped out in
tents at Sembawang Park.
Three days after TOC’s revelation, on 16 January, Saturday, at
around 10pm, officers from the Ministry of Community Development,
Youth and Sports (MCYS), and NParks, together with some 10
policemen, swooped down on the park.
When TOC arrived at the scene at about 10.50pm, there were two
police cars and a pick-up van. Some of the homeless were seen
dismantling their tents. When queried about why they were being
asked to do so, the NParks officers said the campers had broken
“rules and regulations”, even though most of them still had valid
camping permits. The summons referred to Section 9(1)(a) of the
Parks and Trees Regulation Act 2005 which makes it an offence to
conduct a barbeque without a permit, among other things. The
camping permit does not include permission to barbeque,
apparently.
The officers insisted repeatedly that this writer identified those
among the campers who were homeless and that their names and
particulars be given to the officers. This writer declined to do
so.
TOC then asked if there were any representatives from MCYS. A
female officer stepped forward. On being questioned, she would only
say that those who were homeless would be brought to an
“institution”. When TOC probed further on what this “institution”
is, she disclosed that she was referring to Angsana Home, located
at Buangkok Green, next to the Institute of Mental Health.
http://www.streetdirectory.com/asia_...el_site_89755/
The home is part of Pelangi Village, a purpose-built Social Welfare
Complex and houses the elderly destitute and ex-drug addicts.
TOC understands from the campers that
Dr Vivian Balakrishnan, minister in charge of MCYS, had visited the
camping site last Thursday afternoon. In the evening of the same
day, two of the families were told to pack up and were then
effectively carted off to Angsana Home. When they arrived at the
home, they had to pass through a security gate which could only be
unlocked with a pass by one of the attending officers, who claimed
to be from MCYS. Once they were brought to the room where they
would stay, they were told that they could not leave the premises.
To do so, they would have to make a request.
According to one of the families,
when they requested for food, they were given two pieces of roti
prata to be shared among the family of six persons. The mattresses
they were provided were also in bad condition. Some of them had
rashes the next morning after having slept on them.
Two of those locked in had to go to work in the
morning and asked to be let out of the premises. Their request was
denied. Eventually, one of them told TOC she lost her job because
she was unable to show up for work. When TOC asked
the officer about this, she said she “guarantees” that those who
needed to go to work would be allowed to. Still, TOC told her, it
isn’t quite right for the authorities to forceably keep these
people behind locked gates and to confine them. After all, they
have not committed any offence, neither are they criminals who
deserved to be locked up. Further, the homeless do not seem to have
been given a choice of deciding whether they wanted to be housed at
Angsana Home.
According to the lady from MCYS, the stay at Angsana would be a
temporary one, until MCYS finds a place for them. She said it would
be “for a day or two”.
It is hard to persuade people you want to help with such complete
lack of coordination and heavy-handedness, TOC told her. Not with
police cars with lights flashing, officers from the government
ordering tents to be dismantled and summons being issued. We
suggested that there were two choices – one, the campers would be
allowed to stay for another day or two while MCYS looked for a
proper housing option for them; or two, if they were to be housed
temporarily at Angsana, they have to be assured of freedom of
movement. By this time, a senior female officer had taken over the
discussion.
She agreed to let the campers stay at Sembawang Park until Monday,
18 January, when six of the campers will meet with her at the MCYS
office for further discussions to resolve the situation. She said
she will push for the HDB to issue “interim flats” to the campers
in the meantime, or to see if any Voluntary Welfare Organisation
could take them in temporarily.
TOC spoke to some of the homeless about a week earlier and we
understand that some of them had applied for rental flats with the
HDB. However, their applications were rejected for various reasons.
Some have also paid repeated visits to the HDB to apply for these
flats.
When asked where these homeless people would go if they were chased
away, a senior officer from NParks said, “We will help.” One of the
campers retorted, “By putting us in Angsana?” The officer looked
away and replied, “That is the help.”
TOC understands that a summon for overstaying could mean a $200
fine, something which the homeless can hardly afford. Campers are
only allowed to camp for a maximum of eight days in a month, with
consecutive-days camping fixed at a maximum of five days.
We asked if the authorities would consider waiving the fines from
the summons issued to the homeless campers. The MCYS senior officer
said she would speak to NParks as, she said, it was not in her
power to decide.
It was almost midnight before the situation was finally resolved –
at least for now. Only five out of the 20 or so tents were left
standing – and none of the homeless was carted off to Angsana
Home.<!-- / message --><!-- sig -->
Singapore is exposed. Let's post this on an international forum,
muahahaha
