TS: Firstly, we have to ask ourselves, what exactly would
constitute a watershed election? The Opposition winning an entire
GRC (perhaps Aljunied)? The PAP being voted in with less than a 60%
mandate?
Personally, I think the only reasonably certain outcome is that
it will be extremely challenging for the PAP to go back into
parliament with a two-third majority of the votes as they (barely)
did in 2006 for the simple reason that the last two years have been
quite damaging for the ruling party. The Mas Selamat fiasco; the
rising costs of public housing; the poor transparency over the loss
of billions by Temasek Holdings and the subsequent Chip Goodyear
cock-up and most importantly; the high influx of foreigners which
Singaporeans find insufferable are all indicators that it is more
likely than not that the PAP will be voted in back to power with
only a 55-60% approval stamp by the electorate. I hope this
statement of mine will be archived here in sgforums so I can brag
over my prediction should it prove true in 2 years time.
Coupled with the inane faux pas of high-level ministers e.g.
Khaw "Singaporeans should consider putting their eldery in JB
retirement homes" Boon Wan, Mah "PAP wards first priority for LUP"
Boh Tan and recently, Lim "Better, Cheaper and Faster" Swee Sway, I
think the goverment must really move drastically before they
embarrass themselves with a C grade for the elections. They cannot
forever rehash and reshuffle the old "progress package" or "GST
rebate" cards.
But if you define watershed by the ousting of the PAP from
cabinet and the opposition forming the government, even the most
passionate anti-PAP persons will admit that it is an unrealistic
goal. Lee Kuan Yew was stating thetruth when he recently said that
the next two elections (2011, 2016) will see the PAP still in
power. The simple truth is that the opposition is far from mature,
and until you see figures like Chee Soon Juan being replaced with
personalities that can truly form a credible alternative
government, the PAP looks set to hold on to power for the next two
elections.
I think all of us, including those senseless nitwits who post
immature postings like "DIE LKY!!!!11111!" in this forum must
realize that slowly but surely, the PAP cannot forever stand
against the tide. The later generations born post-65 are thoroughly
Americanized and carry the Western ideals of democracy, freedom of
speech, freedom of the press and freedom of assembly too close to
their hearts for the PAP to ignore them in the long-run. Slowly,
but surely, the PAP will have to bend to the people's will beyond
2016.
A country mirrors an individual in terms of development.
Singapore in the 60s and 70s was analagous to a toddler that needed
strict guidance from a dictatorial father to ensure proper
development. The 1981 GE when Jeyaretnam won the first opposition
seat since independence can be compared to the onset of puberty for
a growing Singapore. Likewise, I would like to think that right now
Singapore is akin to a 18-21 year old young adult demanding to be
released from the tight, controlling grip of his patriach
(personified in Old Lee). Sooner or later, the PAP government will
realize that it's time to set the people free, unless they want to
risk the electorate disowning them altogether.
BUT, it will take time. Again, I have to emphasize it's a slow
but sure process. There's no need to come online to a forum and
rave and curse. Let things flow their natural course. Please read
the quote below by LKY and reflect on the truth of the statement.
The Old Man may be a megalomaniac in his elderly state, but there
are still nuggets of wisdom from him:
"If the party doesn’t work, if something goes wrong with the
party, you can be sure new parties will come, new contests will
come. People will spring up to take on the government in no time at
all."