The resident X-rated Fraud never fail to provide light
entertainment with its repeated debacle in
uselessly attempting to white-wash the worn
out image of its Master's Tail with its pseudo-intellect.
Philip J is no stranger to politics. For years since
young he had been trailing his father during elections. He, an
educated man, should have known how the local media works.
There is no conspiracy with the local media except to present the
news as best as the reporter saw fit, to fit his/her subject point,
which is the oddity that a son from the opposition camp
would be holding a critical position within the civil service
managed and administered by the current voted ruling
party.
Can the media itself, or the lower ranked reporters be
capable of any conspiracy - when the higher ranked
management is staffed by PAP political appointees ?
If only the X-rated Fraud had paid attention to its history
lessons, it would have known that the act of its "Master's Tail in
wagging the dog" - cannot be an oddity.
Is this the first time that such an event had occurred to make
it an oddity ?
Even LKY had appointed the late David Marshall to be
the Singapore Ambassador to France, despite the late
David Marshall being LKY's erstwhile political debater
- with a keen mind that rivalled and competed with
LKY.
GCT had even extended a helping hand to both Kenneth
and Philip Jeyaretnam - when many Singapore and Foreign Employers
were reluctant to employ them for fear of political fallout from
LKY and his PAP - as both wer JBJ's sons.
Such are the petty politics that can only exist in Third
World Countries, and when the innocent individuals are used
for their talent - with political mileage being extracted
to polish the image of the PAP.
Is there any oddity to such an event ?
It is no more than a curiousity that the reporter thought would
be of an interest to readers, and thus the focus was on this famous
son, on his thoughts and not about his father or his up and comming
politician brother.
It is not a surprise that the X-rated Fraud - who
has repeatedly claim itself to be "an insignificant nobody" -
will be so immodest as to venture confidently that
"It is no more than a curiousity
that the reporter thought would be of an interest to
readers".
How did the X-rated Fraud come to such a position ?
Was it entirely due to the thinking capabilities of an
"insignificant
nobody" with obvious habit at being a
pseudo-intellect ?
Or has it access to some privileged information that it will not
venture to divulge, but will promote this "naked attempt at a
repair job" - even when there is another thread that put right what
had been deliberately done wrong - as had
been featured in this Thread ?
He had the right to deny such interviews, not to
speak to the ST reporter, which he didnt excercise, and
not the fault of the media, and could have use other media to bring
his subjective points across.
Is the X-rated Fraud attempting to make it the
fault of Philip Jeyaretnam - in agreeing to give
the ST reporter an opportunity to interview him; and it
is not the fault of the ST reporter for skewing the interview
with a hidden political agenda that needed Philip Jeyaretanm to
demand clarification to be published ?
That he would sought to clarify the reporter's disinterest or
out of topic subjects, and demanded for the
reporter to say what he wishes to put across is an authoritarian
request, which even the newspaper graciously allowed.
What possibly could the resident X-rated pseudo-intellect
intend to mean with its dubious words in the "authoritarian request" ?
Was it due to the newspaper behaving "graciously" to allow a correction to
be made, or was it due to the status of Philip Jeyaretnam
?
Had it been any other "insignificant nobody" as an
ordinary Singapore Citizen - it is doubtful even the X-rated
Fraud or anyone will get the same width of respect that
had been given to Philip Jeyaretnam for the corrections made.
Such an attitude is not lost on the general public, whom are not
blind or crazy, whom are rational, but of course, there will be
some who had been blinded by hatred for the ruling party, the
media, etc to go crazy.
It is a surprise that for one that is not blind or crazy, it
pseudo-intellect has to pre-empt any possibility of having itself
being debunked - as displayed in such churlish attempt.
The ordinary citizens - who are not blind or crazy
- will be wondering what possibly can the resident X-rated
Fraud intend to mean, with such a defensive posture - when it
is already reputed for its pseudo-intellect and immense skills at
deceit, dishonesty and duplicity.
Has the X-rated Fraud again Double-XX itself in its hurried rush
to justify its position, when it knows that it
is untenable ?
Worse still, will be some wild ones who by their numerous insane
repetitive posts here and other threads, would make
use Angel7030's post which reminded Philip J his right,
but twisted to be something else to deny Angel7030 of her right to
speak up here, an annonymous free site .
The disingenious abilities of the X-rated Fraud seems to be
unlimited, and begins with its reading abilities, to its writing
skills, and further beyond into its deluded glory.
It is not pathetic for the X-rated Fraud to be unable to note
that the Taiwanese 'hum' - that it sees as an angel with a capital
'A' - had a totally different
view from its own fraudelent interpretation of the
reporter's intentions.
While the X-rated Fraud read the post as "no more than a curiousity that the reporter
thought would be of an interest to readers, and thus the focus was
on this famous son, on his thoughts and not
about his father or
his up and comming politician brother
"
- its 'angelic' Taiwanese 'hum' had intepreted it
as - "not interested in
his position, that wouldn't bring much news and front page
sensational in the media, his
brother and late father is the ultimate news the reporters
wanted".
For a X-rated Fraud that can skew the meaning of its besotted
angel with a capital 'A' - can it be depended to interprete what
its angel intended with its deluded mind ?
If only the X-rated Fraud with its insufferable pseudo-intellect
will take the advise of its 'angel' with a capital 'A' - to simply
'SHUT
UP' if it has nothing to say.
Well, he has the right to remain silent or refuse the interview,
he should known the media well, they are not interested in his
position, that wouldn't bring much news and front page sensational
in the media, his brother and late father is the ultimate news the
reporters wanted, he should be careful. Just Shut up