Typical cocksucker of CSJ, refusing to debate but keeps calling
people who do not share similar political views as hogs and
swines.
No not just "hogs" and "swines" - but "zwei-siao-hogs" and
"Fascist Hogs" - not swines.
Calling people who do not share similar political views ?
Or labellng those miscreants who indulge in boastful
hollow political views that under cut honest political views that
do not sit well with the views of the miscreants ?
Refusing to debate ?
Surely the "Fascist" mind of a pretentious "Bavarian Hog"
exposed for all its "zwei-siao" hollow
debating positions, cannot possibly sink lower into its
own dishonesty ?
If one were to return to my last response at the end
of the previous Page 9 of this thread, has the
"Fascist Hog" not again proven its own "zwei-siao" posiion in
not debating the exposed mistakes, but will prefer to
indulge in its "zwei-siao" childish tantruamic display, after
being repeatedly beaten silly ?
For your benefit, the last post is repeated below for your
convenience -
Yes, you intend to insult people and not a wrongful cause. Hence it
can be viewed that you are stupid and not worthy to be considered
human.
A "zwei-siao-hog" is already bad enought, do you need to be
a "Fascist Hog" as well to achieve the superlative level
of being The Worst Hog ?
"Fascism" has a reputation for not being logical, nor objective,
nor are they respected to be worthy of being considered for
anything by any Human Standards.
Do you need to prove yourself so badly ?
Can we trust a "zwei-siao-hog" to be honest with its own
accuracy of what its reply is intended ?
I have clearly replied to yoyayou's statement that:
young PAP need to know,
they are NOT working for
the money. they are working FOR the needs of fellow
singaporeans.
PAP does have
many capable personnel but all are forced to toe the party
line. So wake up your ideas and stop fingerpoint at
everyone.
Can the above reply in "blue" be a correct
extract of the issue raised by "yoyayou" on Page 2 of this thread -
which the "Fascist Hog" attempt to be diligent in repeating the
issue ?
Or has the "Fascist Hog" now been exposed for attempting
to cheat with its own argument by creating a new
dishonest debate to prove its "zwei-siao" positon to be correct
?
The reply by the "zwei-siao-Fascist-Hog" on Page 2, 04 Oct '09,
6.48PM is not displayed in its actual form as shown above,
when the correct and accurate version from Page 2 is as
follows:-
thats why he need to come out
of protesting and use his inteligence on solution, how can he help
improve.
instead of grumble and
grumbing..
and he need to have a widen
heart to be able to work with the current ruling
party.
if not hardly any ppl will
vote for him, thats a fact.
PAP does have many capable
personnel but all are forced to toe the party line. So wake up your
ideas and stop fingerpoint at everyone.
If the "Fascist Hog" intention is to be
dishonestly clever, it should first learn to drop off
its "zweil-siao" characteristics by at least being honest
with itself.
It is no use to be dishonest when it
is convenient for the moment.
And to fireng's statement:
Even if the opposition party has a proper
plan do you think it will be accepted? Would the govt which make up
of the majority who are from PAP accept plans proposed by the
opposition?
My reply was:
Stupid question, should ask if the common
people can accept any plan from the opposition first. And see if
the alternative party can be voted into power by such a
ticket.
Was fireng's question stupid, or does
the stooopidity of a "Fascist Hog" forget its own demand
for logic in the replies from
others; and its demand for the standards
of Democracy as part of the "Basic Social Skills" in
debate ?
Obviously again, its "Fascist Standards" are applicable
only on others, as such Fascist standards will undermine its
own "zwei-siao" position as a pretentious "Bavarian Hog" ?
Can a "Fascist Hog" answer which should come first - the chicken
or the egg ?
If the Government cannot accept the plans from the Opposition,
do you think that it is any good for the Opposition to offer any to
the Government ?
What makes the "Fascist Hog" so certain that the Government will
even listen to the Citizens - if the Citizens were to accept the
plans from the Opposition ?
In the other thread - ‘SDP calls on Dr Teo to stand with Bukit
Panjang residents’ (*1) - the people are calling for their
existing wet market not to be demolished - and had even
recruited the assistance of their Elected MP from the "albino
gorillas".
Did the Government even listened to the call from its own
"albino Gorilla' ?
Did the Government even listened to the voice of those residents
?
Did the Government even appreciate the "Fascist Hog" for turning
the spotlight on the stoooopidity of its statement to have the
Citizen accept the Opposition plans first ?
So you shows that
Atobe, the ATurddy, is a common prick without social conscience and
wanting to insult any Singaporean who stands up for the people and
democracy.Since you are not interested in human debate, let's get
on with the name-calling and
mud-slinging.
Have you grown tired of your "play-turd" now, and elevate
the simple "turd" into some "ATurddy" with a common prick that
a "zwei-siao-hog" can only wish to have ?
Is a "Fascist Hog" qualified to comment
on anyone's ability to "stand up for the people and
democracy" - when CSJ is consistenly mowed down by the
"Fascist Hog" even as CSJ is the most pro-active and vocal
towards the "albino gorillas" in demanding the return
of the democratic rights to the people of Singapore ?
It is quite obvious by now that the "zwei-siao-hog" cannot
possibly be good at any form of debate, nor even to fulfill its
boasts of keeping to its own version of "basic social skill"
at democratic debate.
Can the "zwei-siao-hog" be any good at "name-calling" when it
displayed such poor skill at handling its own "turd" - and
have to downgrade to its more familiar "mud" ?
