Oops, got the wrong guy, 
, sorry sorry. Alway think of Lim Yew Hock, i
think he is more famous than Lim Hock Siew, name sound like the
same, are they related??
Anyway, either Yew Hock or Hock Siew or Pig Hock, I am going to
say once again, if you are not ruthless, cunning, smart and
have a good foresight of things to come, you better dun join
politics, I think all these peoples do not have that capability.
Sad, but it is true. They will be better off if they had
either joined LKY in PAP or be some lecturers or businessmen and
live happily everafter with 3 to 4 wifeys.
Just a question for my Uncle Flash Atobe, how much does per kg
of intergrity worth? If you tell me that intergrity is intangible,
I said it is worth nothing. In many a times, in history of kingdoms
and dynasties, you had read about princes and ministers kowtow to
it master (king or emperor) with an ulterior motives, they dun
losing all their intergrity for the objective of success when time
for coup de grace arrive. And when you are on top of it, that
intergrity lost is worth the cause. Hock Siew, should had been
smarter, so are others, I should had been their female advisor
then, perhap then, they would not had suffered so badly.
On the other hand, I dun really blame them for holding on their
intergrity for the sake of being bravery for nothing. Why? Because,
Communism at that time, incalcated trustworthiness, heroicism,
uphold of intergrity and Bravery. An exact opposite of the
British(west) educated/trained people like LKY who are
trained in skrewness and yet with the ability to tapped on
communist weak point.
My taiwan former president, Chiang Kai Shek was a
direct opposite of what had happen in Singapore, he was
too naive and believed his advisors too much. And Mao,
the shrew and cunning communist, paved all the way to chase
him out of mainland china. If both all the Lims politicians of
that time in singapore is like Mao, who incalcated all these
stupid communism philosophies of righteous and uphold
intergrity but never practice himself, today, my Uncle Atobe might
be a Prime Minister of Singapore, Hock Siew might be the MM
and so on. 4sg will still remain to clean the parliament house. And
me, Angel would had more business. UNDERSTAND!!!
Only the dumbness of a Taiwanese "hum" will want to determine
the weight of "integrity" - as it has nothing of any worth to be
mentioned about its own integrity.
What if the integrity weights only 0.5 grams - will the
Taiwanese "hum" trample on it ?
It will not be a surprise if the Taiwanese "hum" will sell
its "hum" for 0.5 grams of gold - as its integrity means
littel to the "hum" ?
The answer is obvious considering the lack of integrity in the
"hum" to even appreciate what integrity is all about.
Your understanding of the history is as bad as your
understanding of the politics of Singapore.
Was Chiang Kai Shek naive to listen to his advisors, or was he
simply incompetent to lead those who had believed in him, and
with him having no ability to control his ego to defeat Mao -
even when Mao was pressed to make the Long March into near
oblivion ?
You have no business to associate any of the Singaporean
loyalists to be Communist when you have no knowledge of the
politics of Singapore during the 1950s, and depend only on the
filth that was fed into your "hum" brain.
Mao succeeded as he was able to seize the upper hand in
exploiting Chiang's failure to manage his own opportunities by
attacking his own corrupted subordinate generals that abuse China's
citizens through the barrel of the gun.
Singapore politicians of the 1950s were all similar in spirit as
Sun Yat Sen efforts to modernise China and take it away from the
clutches of the corrupt Empress that destroyed China
single-handedly.
Singapore will similarly be destroyed by LKY's skewed vision and
political ambitions that project only the interest of the PAP first
and Singaporeans second.
A Taiwanese "hum" will be the cause of internal strife with its
continued idiocy to distort the political history as designed by
the PAP.
Do we need a Taiwanese "hum" to teach Singaporeans our history
when its own knowledg of Taiwanese history is as bad if not worst
?
