The intelleigence of a X-rated pseudo-intellect never fail to
amaze with its attempts to persistently impose its
insufferable skewed impressions on its imagined wider audience
that it hope to make another grandstanding event.
The TS actually asked TWO different questions.
It certainly take some remarkable genius for a X-rated
pseudo-intellect to interprete a simple SINGLE line question :
"Free market economy w/o capitalism?" into TWO
different questions to be complicated with its own weak language
skills that have been exposed so frequently.
One in the title of this thread, and the other in his 1st
post.
As answered and explained by my personal and
simplified view on my initial post, there can be no
free market w/o capitalism.
Is there any marked difference in the title of the thread
"Free market economy w/o capitalism?" and the
statement made by TS in his first post - which state:
"Like to seek the advice of the forummers here is it
possible to have a free market economy in a society with unbridled
capitalism?"
Which part does the X-rated pseudo-intellect see in the
statement that differs from the title of the thread ?
"Like to seek the advice of the forummers here" - or -
"is it possible to have a free market economy in a society with
unbridled capitalism?"
Is there a difference between "capitalism" and "unbridled
capitalism" that the absence of either one will not allow
"Free Economy" to function ?
However, to answer to TS second question, now that I have time
to share a thought, I doubt if there can be free market
economy in a society with unbridled capitalism.
Unbridled would mean unrestrained or uncontrolled. If I did
not misinterprete TS at word value, he would mean a free market
economy in a society with uncontrolled capitalism.
Was there any intelligent thought shared from these two
sentences - or is this not a regurgitation of what the TS had said
from the beginning that the X-rated pseudo-intellect attempt to
simplify to its level of understanding - (with the obvious
influence from Lim Swee Say whom it idolise) ?
Unbridled capitalism within a democracy would mean less or
no govt control and regulation, and allow the market to be
dictated by free enterprise - in other words - the law of the
jungle applies - survival of the fittest. No level playing field.
No unions. No laws save constitutional laws of the land. The govt
is supposed to shut up where biz is concern.
What does forms of government - whether democracy
or others - got anything to do with "unbridled
Capitalism" ?
Does the X-rated pseudo-intellect intend to sell its
alternative idea that "the
govt should NOT shut up where biz is
concern" ?
If the government should interfere in business - can there be
"free market economy" ?
Even with the government existing - can the X-rated
pseudo-intellect be any more certain that the "Laws of the Jungle"
do not exist ?
Or does the X-rated Fraud expect Governments to bail out
all failed investments - as it had indicated in the other
thread ‘新加坡,从张牙舞爪到摇尾乞怜，从恩将仇报到死皮赖脸[转]
(*1) - when it had demanded
from the ignorant China kid to get
China to compensate Singapore for the failed Suzhou Industrial
Park Project that was freely offered and insisted by the Singapore
Government to show-case its talents ?
Civilised human beings did not step out of the jungle for
nothing. Jungle laws were harsh, terrifying and would only doom a
tribe to extinction, even with the supposition that the tribe was
made up of noble people, which we know nobility is not gifted in
equal measure to every human.
The condescending attitude of the X-rated pseudo-intellect
obviously does not know of the pleasant life that the primitive
tribesmen living as the Lost Tribes in the hills of Papua New
Guinea, East Timor, in the Brazilian jungles, and all across the
globe.
The world will simply turned on its axis - while the
X-rated Fraud continue to live in its own comfort zone with
its hoped for wider audience that it will attempt
to impress with its condescending speeches based on
pompous ideas that it never fail to plagiarize.
Even if the financial crisis had not happened, without govt
regulation corporations will instead become dictators of the
economy, with their bottomlines being the reason of the existance
or annihilation.
Everything else are illusions and the goal is to achieve the
targetted bottomlines to pay off shareholders - no reason, no law,
no concern, and espacially no welfare to anyone, any society and
employees, nothing must get in their way, everything and everyone
a fair game, everything to be achieve at any costs, even
murder as long as one doesnt get caught. The mighty bottomline is
the final reward, which will flow into theirs and their
shareholders pockets.
Why has the X-rated Fraud missed the glaring
fact the Government in Singapore is above the Law, when
the Government becomes a participant in
the free economy as part of "capitalism" or "unbridled
Capitalism" - and becomes the worst of Capitalism with Government
powers to abuse the "Free Market Economy"
?
Is the X-rated Fraud too ashamed to mention the fact that the
Singapore Government is not only a Political Autocrat but had also
become "dictators of the
economy" ?
Nope. Private enterprises should be free from govt
interferences, but there must be regulations to ensure a cowboy
free for all culture do not exist.
Obviously, the ignorance of the X-rated pseudo-intellect will
overlook the Singapore Government involvement in Private Enterprise
- closing Statutory Boards and retrenching the Civil Servants, and
opening new Private Corporations capitalised by Public Money and
staffed by the Civil Servants who were previously retrenched - and
to provide the same basic essential service that is required by
Singaporeans.
With the Government at every strata of the economy, determining
wages, prices, and costings - is this not a "free for all culture"
based on the Laws of the Jungle as the PAP Government sees fit
to tweak the Law and re-interprete to their own advantage
?
It is certainly revealing the intellectual prowess of the
resident X-rated Fraud.
