In that case, USA should start first by including itself in its own
State Department human rights report.
It has no rights complaining about the authoritarian
societies of other countries when it has the largest percentage of
its own citizens imprisoned.
It has no rights insisting that other countries let their banks
fail when it did not.
It has no rights complaining about Iran supporting terrorisms in
the Middle East when it did the same against the Soviet Union.
It wants Iran's nuclear facilities to be opened to
international weapons inspectors but does not allow the same thing
in its own country.
This is an open forum, it's just discussion and doesn't have any
policy setting powers.
Find it funny that we can criticize all we want about China and
Singapore but somehow it's hands off for America?
The thing
with a generic word Peace than everyone has an
opinion.
But all of you
miss out one point isn't..........Did Obama wanted the Award? Did
he consciously petition for that Award?
He already said
he did not deserve the award....so what else is there to say? To
date no elected leaders has not accepted the nomination.
Should a leader of a country snub Oslo?
Oslo
wanted to stick it to President
Bush....But Oslo is also
saying that it agreed with Obama administration of reducing
unilateral policies but more diplomacy thru negotiation. Thereby,
changing the tone in world tension particularly nuclear
proliferation.
So if any
of you cannot read simple interpretation of Oslo that’s too
bad.