you are right on the real core issue. Many parents in 2 room
flats can find the time to have babies because they don't have
the money that require time to spend. So the incentives will
help them to reduce their financial burden in having kids.
those who have lots of money, they take more time to
make more money and actually many don't have time to spend, they
leave their kids to the maids. no bonus will work for
them.
but of course there are those who are even not
married, some because nobody want them, so give them bonus also no
use. there are also some couples, can't give birth no matter how
they try, may be take too much contraceptives in the beginning.
and finally, many babies in this forum, they need to grow
up first, find a girlfriend, then hope their wife can give birth,
oh...they need also to find job to feed the wife first, otherwise
there will only talk about baby bonus from what they hear from
their friends.
I think u're right. U've covered most if not all of the bases on
our segments. My take on this is even when u give the baby bonus
& extended maternity leave, for the lower income, its doesn't
really much of a difference. And for the higher income, taxes &
money are not the issue. So while the intentions may be good,
i think the benefits may not click.
I think today,before anyone has a family, 1st thing they'll ask
is, Can i afford it? Next, will i hv time for my kids? Sure u can
take 2 -3 jobs, bt pretty soon the child is gonna call another
person daddy or mommy, & as it is, our divorce rate sare on the
rise.
I feel a more long term solutuon to this wld be,
Entreprenership. Natrually, the devil is in the details,,,etc,,,
currently all the schemes they hv under Spring, Seeds, etc...does
not really cater for the mom & pop business. So if
there're really serious abt this, they shld make credit more easily
accessible for the Sporeans to be self-reliant, & hv
more time for their families after the initial start-up
period.