"quote_from":Originally posted by Atobe:
It will not be surprising that the noisy pussy has
again retracted his noisy position that get him
excited over non-events - and this time in his false statement
that Seah Chiang Nee is a Malaysian, when Seah
is more red blooded Singaporean then the noisy pussy.
From the issues raised, the noisy pussy has avoided reference to
his pet issues in his last response which have been debunked,
and now try to mislead with nonsensical verbage as he try to
impress with all the garbage.
Unfortunately, despite LKY having "taught SG people English
and built up economy so far" - we still get noisy pussies
making simple grammatical errors that even little kids know
that "LKY should not TEACH SG people English" in the
manner so poorly learnt by the noisy pussy.
If LKY had built up the economy - why will the noisy pussy
remain so bitter about OZ not accepting his application to
emmigrate ?
Could it be the unique Singlish that the noisy pussy hope to
pass for Oz English ?
As matters stand, despite the LKY supposed success
with "SG...built up economy so far" - it is surprising that
LKY will want Singaporeans to spread our wings and venture abroad
to take on jobs in China, Middle-east, India, supposedly to spread
our Singapore values.
If the SG economy is so built-up - as claimed by the resident
noisy pussy - is there no need for the trained manpower that LKY
want them to go overseas ?
With the brain drain - is it not happening now
that Singapore require the graduates from Brunei, China,
India, Indonesia, Malaysia, Myanmar, Philippines, and
even Vietnam ?
In the statistics produced by the Government Department of
Statistics - Singaporeans are lumped with the Permanent Residents
for the purpose of all kinds of statistical studies.
Is it not ironical that this is for the purpose of hiding the
increase in the real numbers of foreigners taking up Permanent
Residentship and confuse Singaporeans about the real
numbers that are Citizens ?
Why will the noisy pussy depend on
historical data to the GDP that is based on 2000 Market
Prices ?
Is there something that the noisy pussy is too shy to place in
the spot light ?
From the CIA Fact Book on Hong Kong and Singapore the following comparison can be
made:-
Hong Kong - GDP (Purchasing Power Parity)
$307.6 Billion (2008 est); $299.5 Billion (2007 est);
$281.5 Billion (2006 est)
Singapore - GDP (PPP)
$240 Billion (2008 est); $237.2 Billion (2007
est); $216.4 Billion (2006 est).
Hong Kong - GDP - Real Growth Rate:
2.8% (2008 est); 6.4% (2007 est); 7%
(2006 est)
Singapore - GDP - Real Growth Rate:
1.2% (2008 est); 7.7% (2007 est); 8.2% (2006
est)
Hong Kong Labor Force: 3.67 million (2008 est)
Singapore Labor Force: 2.96 million (2008 est)
Hong Kong - Inflation Rate (consumer prices): 2.1%
(2008 est)
Singapore - Inflation Rate (consumer prices): 4.3% (2008
est)
Hong Kong Public Debt: 14.5% of GDP (2008 est)
Singapore Public Debt: 113.7% of GDP (2008 est)
Hong Kong Exports: $362.1 Billion f.o.b. including
re-exports (2008)
Singapore Exports: $235.8 Billion f.o.b. (2008 est)
Hong Kong Imports: $387.9 Billion (2008 est)
Singapore Imports: $219.5 Billion (2008
est)
Hong Kong Current Account Balance: $22.44 Billion (2008 est)
Singapore Current Account Balance: $28.42 Billion (2008 est)
Hong Kong Reserves of foreign exchange and gold: $165.9
Billion (31-Dec 2008)
Singapore Reserves of foreign exchange and gold: $168.8 Billion
(31-Dec 2008)
How did the PAP Government
create so much in the Reserves when Singapore export numbers
are less than Hong Kong's ?
We should consider that the value of the Singapore Reserves
are not the full amount that is publicly declared, as we know that
the true amount is much larger that allowed LKY to overlook the
loss of US$100 Billion by GIC and Temasek Holdings.
If the noisy pussy will learn to be more discerning perhaps he
can be trained to perform more credibly in an
Oz zoo.
Again, the noisy pussy is only interested in making more
noise then offer facts - when claiming that Seah Chiang Nee is a
Malaysian.
Seah Chiang Nee is a true blue Singaporean -
who was the editor of the Singapore Monitor before it was closed by
the PAP Government.
He had worked overseas with several different news agencies, one
of which was in Ozland that we all know have rejected the
noisy pussy.
In 1985, he became the first South-east Asian to have a heart
transplant, and this was well published in the local media
as the first Singaporean to have such an operation.
Who donated that heart that beat inside his body is immaterial,
we know that this is a World Class Singaporean that the noisy pussy
can hardly even qualify to lick his boots.
With regards to the "the
fxxking billions dollars in the Wat Port,wat Funds, series of
corruptions" - these have been well published in the
Malaysian Press, with the ACA investigating the matters, as much as
the different political parties digging deeper into the
scandals.
If this was to happen in Singapore, will there ever be any
independent investigation, or will the culprits be allowed to
abscond as in the case of PAP MP Phey Yew Kok ?
Will any alternative Singapore Political Parties be as
aggressive to demand the investigation to the loss of the US$100
Billion by the super talents at the helm of the GIC and Temasek
Holdings ?
In any case, the loss of the Malaysian funds are in hundreds of millions in
RINGGIT, compared to the US$100 Billion lost by MM LKY -
Chairman of GIC and daughter-in-law as the CEO of Temasek
Holdings.
1.Gross exports v net
exports
can i focus on exports figures.Let me show u how to read between
the lines.
wat u quote are Gross Export figures.Hk
and SG are heavely re--export countries.
Wat u read every month abt SG
non--oil export figures are referring to gross
exports.Becos they did
not say it is a net export figures.
In SG abt 80 % exports are re--exports.
Refer to HK,there are not too many factories,so how can they
produce
so much goods locally?
[PDF]
-Fig 9--exports of goods or page 11
In the unique language of the noisy pussy that serves to confuse
himself with facts that exist, only he will argue with his own
noise.
If the data provided in my response is Gross Export that
include re-export for Hong Kong, and if the pussy
had claimed that SG and HK are both heavily dependent on
re-export - are there any difference that make it
inappropriate for such comparisons to be made between HK and SG
?
If the pussy claim that SG non-oil exports are
referring to Gross Exports - is there any worthwhile issue
that the pussy intend to raise that makes the SG data
inaccurate to be compared to HK ?
In the data provided in my last response it was shown
as HK Exports had included re-export -
Hong Kong Exports: $362.1 Billion f.o.b. including
re-exports (2008)
Singapore Exports: $235.8 Billion f.o.b. (2008
est)
With all the numbers showing HK to have excelled over SG - in
terms of exports, it is surprising that SG can still get ahead of
HK in its accumulated reserves.
2.
oh dear,ask your stats or maths teacher lah.Constant prices make
comparsions
meaningful.understand?
Constant prices make comparisons meaningful ?
In your last post when you mentioned your "Statistics Singapore - Historical Data on
GDP at 2000 Market Prices" - what historical
data have you made available for the Year 2000 market prices
being used ?
Are you accepting the data provided without any critical views
simply due to your way of blind acceptance of PAPa telling that it
is good as shown ?
Do you know how the Year 2000 Market Prices is made to
affect the outcome of the GDP values for Year 1960 ?
Are you trying to impress with the PAP propaganda
to hoodwink others in this Speaker's Corner ?
3."If this was to
happen in Singapore, will there ever be any independent
investigation, or will the culprits be allowed to abscond as in the
case of PAP MP Phey Yew Kok ?"
Yes we have The President.Ok?
Besides,The 50 years ruling PAP will clean up itself
automatically,thanks
to the very high salary.Peanut is just for monkey.Meat for
lion.
Oh SG has a happy problem that we have too much $$ in GIC and
Temasek.
So a little up and down make a hot topics for Opposition to
shout!
4..ONE DAY.JUST one day,if
the life in the north is better than SG,wat do u think
SG pple will do?They will Q up at MY Embassy in Singapore to
apply
migration visa lah.There is no need for Mr Seah to tell us how
bad
the life in SG.we know,like our grand/parents,how to
choose.
It is doubtful that the noisy pussy can be like his
grand/parents - knowing how to choose - as all he know is to follow
the path without realising that a new age requires a new thinking,
and following the same dead beat path like a natural instinct is a
sure way to go into extinction.
Do Singaporeans have to wait for that one day in the future to Q
up at the Malaysian counter ?
If only the noisy pussy is a little smarter he could
replace PAP Minister Khaw Boon Wan - who had
suggested that Singaporeans who cannot afford to keep their aged
parents in Singapore, should send them to Malaysia.
Is Minister Khaw finally admitting that the PAP policies have
failed Singaporeans ?
Yes, peanuts for the monkeys and meat for the lion - as LKY had
said:- "keep the stomach full and dull the brain" -
do we need to wonder why the pussy in this Speaker's Corner is
pure brainless ?
Only the pussy will accept that what has been paid to LKY's
talents are peanuts.
Yes, 50 years of PAP rule will clean up automatically all the
treasury soon with the million dollar wages paid to the PAP
miinisters during good and bad times, and like the executives of
the failed US banking systems - even when these banks are going
bankrupt, the executives will get their million dollar
remunerations.
Singapore will continue paying the PAP ministers their million
dollar salaries and bonuses even as they lose US$100 Billion from
our reserves.
Is the Elected President any good for Singaporeans - when the
second key held by him is only a "dummy key" ?
The real key was held for a short time by the late President Ong
Teng Cheong, who dared to exercise the powers vested in his office,
but unfortunately he could not out manouvre all the PAP MPs who
change the legislations to make the Elected Presidency less
effective.
Is the Elected President any good ?
