Dunt do it in public place:Law Minister tells gays.
Do's & Don't's of gays in Singapore?
I cant find the following in English medias.
http://www.zaobao.com.sg/sp/sp090706_001.shtml
valid for 7 days
他说：“在当今的社会，（诉诸法律）清算同性恋者并不公平。与此同时，我们的社会还没做好准备，使同性恋行为合法化。很多家长不希望孩子接触同性恋性行为。因此，我们吁请同性恋者不要在公共场合进行同性性行为，以免家长不安。
(lousy translation ny
lion)--”Many parents do not ......... Therefore, we call
upon homosexuals should not carry out such acts in public place, so
as to make parents uneasy. "
nnnn
http://www.channelnewsasia.com/stories/singaporelocalnews/view/440540/1/.html
This is in consistent with gavaman 's stand.
6 On Mr Shanmugam's concern over the application of section 377,
let me assure the Member that AGC has been clear and consistent in
its approach when prosecuting offenders under this section. We
prosecute persons under section 377 where oral sex is performed
with a minor under 16 years of age, or where the act is
carried out in public,
involved deception, coercion or which amounted to sexual assault.
We also prosecute persons who have taken advantage of the mentally
deficient, or who abuse their positions of trust, dominance or
authority to sexually abuse and exploit those who are in their
care. I have gone through the facts of recent cases. The cases
prosecuted bear this out. In some of them, multiple factors were
present.
7 No man or woman engaging in consensual oral sex in private even
though, strictly speaking, coming within the ambit of section 377,
has been prosecuted for many years now. This was clarified by my
Ministry in an earlier case involving a Police officer and an
under-aged girl. In this and the other recent cases that were
prosecuted in Court, there were one or more of the aggravating
factors that I had mentioned earlier.
8 Section 377 is framed in wide terms. Yet, AGC only prosecutes
certain cases. Is this a haphazard approach that is undesirable?
Under Article 35(8) of our Constitution, the Attorney-General who
is also the Public Prosecutor, is vested with the discretion to
institute, conduct or discontinue any proceedings for any offence.
The Privy Council held in Teh Cheng Poh vs PP, an appeal
from Malaysia, hence of persuasive authority, that there are many
factors which a prosecution authority may properly take into
account in exercising its discretion whether to charge a person at
all. The PP takes into account all the relevant factors of an
individual case before taking a decision to charge a person.
Basically, our Constitution requires all cases to be given unbiased
consideration by the PP, and that the decision made not be dictated
by irrelevant considerations. The primary consideration is whether
it is in the public interest to prosecute the offender. Even if the
victim purportedly gives consent, the public interest in such
prosecution is to protect those who are vulnerable - whether from
tender age, mental deficiency or arising from a position of trust
and dominance. This scope of coverage is borne out by provisions on
sexual offences found in the other provisions of the Penal Code,
Children and Young Persons Act and the Women's Charter. Hence, the
way s 377 has been applied does not breach the rule of law. These
considerations are also relevant and taken into account in
prosecution of such cases in other jurisdictions (US, UK).
9 Dr Wang, Mr Shanmugam, Mr Chong and Mdm Ho have specifically
asked that section 377 be reviewed. Indeed, we are doing just that.
We are considering decriminalising consensual oral sex done in
private between a male and female above 16 years old. We will study
the most appropriate approach to effect changes to this aspect of
the law, which will also ensure that non-consensual oral sex
remains an offence.
http://www.mha.gov.sg/news_details.aspx?nid=Nzkw-xDx%2FDmFqAEI%3D
mmm
So long u do it behind closed door,no body will bother u,subject
to conditions
listed above.......
2.Sect 377A is
a paper tiger,so long u dunt pull its tail.Ok?
3.Get the
willing and right person(no minor ,pl).
Get the right place and protection.I dunt think u will get into
trouble.
4.why dunt u
buy a HDB flat or private property with your partner?This is
legal .
PAP knows wat is going on in society.
Eligibility Scheme - Joint Singles Scheme
@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@
u think SG is very stubborn?
SG is more liberal in gay issue
than HK
Retuers ignorant on Sg gay
issue
SG already NO OBJECTION to
gay/lesbian
Gay professor work in NUS &
bring his partner here
Is it clear?Just do it with right person in right place with
right protection.
