Asean is once again held Hostage by Myanmar

last SG · 2009-05-26T23:37:41+00:00

if myanmar chair asean than you see china sitting behind the curtain.....back to emperior dowager. then we will be smoking opium again..wee..high high!!

Arapahoe SG

i have not read any news from ASEAN position. I really do not see how Asean can remain silent on this topics.

Myanmar's pro-democracy leader Aung San Suu Kyi went on trial Monday, as hundreds of riot police ringed the country's most notorious prison to block protesters from proceedings that could send her to jail for five years.

Suu Kyi, who has already spend more than 13 of the last 19 years in detention, has been charged with violating the conditions of her house arrest by sheltering an American man who swam to her lakeside home to secretly visit her earlier this month.

dumbdumb! SG

hmm. usually no country will stand up if they hv nothing to gain out of it.. and if they have to risk their own necks.

can't blame anyone.

EarlNeo SG

if u r recall into NS and ship to fight the war against Myanmar due to this, will u wanna go? or let ur son or dad or frens go?

angel7030 SG

In the Asean position, the asean countries had agreed not to interfere in each other domestic issue, the focus of asean is mostly on trade, economy, security and friendship.

The Asean Consituency adopt a non domestic intervention under code 7030 capt 23 para II.

For Asean, this is

Angel

CNN

Ah Chia SG

The death of Aung San Suu Kyi's father Aung San, Myanmars' independence leader had always been shrounded in secrey.

Below are sources that push the view that it was the british who killed Aung San:

Q: Who do you think really killed Bogyoke Aung San?

A: Who really killed Bogyoke Aung San was the British government. It was their plot.

Q: Why do you say that?

A: I suppose there were three reasons why he was killed.

Firstly, Bogyoke Aung San was the leader who could organise and unite the whole country so they were afraid of the whole of Burma uniting. This was the main reason.

Secondly, Bogyoke Aung San could reunite with the Communist Party of Burma. They were worried about that too.

And finally, they supposed that they could handle Burma more easily if they removed him.

These were the reasons why he was killed.

I better give my opinions and some evidence why I say that the British were involved in this assassination.

First evidence From the very beginning, the British government had noticed that U Saw was conspiring something.

They even understood that these actions were aimed at Bogyoke. Regarding this fact I remember two things. First, before the assassination, U Saw’s house was kept under police surveillance. One of my relatives who was then a police officer, told me that he was on duty from a nearby house a week before the assassination. He said that they had to report their findings daily and thought surveillance had begun even before he was put on duty.

The second thing is that during 1960’s or 1970’s on one Martyr’s Day anniversary, one of the Burmese newspapers published an article...

http://www.irrawaddy.org/article.php?

Who really killed Aung San?

http://www.youtube.com/results?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aung_San

angel7030 SG

The death of Aung San Suu Kyi's father Aung San, Myanmars' independence leader had always been shrounded in secrey.

Below are sources that push the view that it was the british who killed Aung San:

Q: Who do you think really killed Bogyoke Aung San?

A: Who really killed Bogyoke Aung San was the British government. It was their plot.

Q: Why do you say that?

A: I suppose there were three reasons why he was killed.

Firstly, Bogyoke Aung San was the leader who could organise and unite the whole country so they were afraid of the whole of Burma uniting. This was the main reason.

Secondly, Bogyoke Aung San could reunite with the Communist Party of Burma. They were worried about that too.

And finally, they supposed that they could handle Burma more easily if they removed him.

These were the reasons why he was killed.

I better give my opinions and some evidence why I say that the British were involved in this assassination.

First evidence From the very beginning, the British government had noticed that U Saw was conspiring something.

The second thing is that during 1960’s or 1970’s on one Martyr’s Day anniversary, one of the Burmese newspapers published an article...

http://www.irrawaddy.org/article.php?

Who really killed Aung San?

http://www.youtube.com/results?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aung_San

ke lian the San San

dadeadman1337 SG

Unless there's a war, the junta will nvr release their grip on power. Sanctions are useless against an uncaring govt

Arapahoe SG

the military Junta can extend its wing because China is backing them up internationally. It continue to snub Asean because it knows China back them up in the UN.

The only way you can get Myanmar to comply is to turn the tide between China and Myanmar.

Ah Chia SG

the military Junta can extend its wing because China is backing them up internationally.

Not only China, but also Russia.

http://mensnewsdaily.com/2007/01/

deepak.c SG

All that is necessary for evil to triumph is for good men to do nothing. -- Edmund Burke

deepak.c SG

It's a sad thing to see humanity devolve into a system where financial benefits have to be reaped before a helping hand is given.

gigabyte14 SG

im waiting for a revolution

a revolution where the myanmar people rise to topple the government

and interpol to mark these leaders of the revolution as 'terrorists'

Arapahoe SG

im waiting for a revolution

a revolution where the myanmar people rise to topple the government

and interpol to mark these leaders of the revolution as 'terrorists'

Well you know if the funding of Interpol are from China than everything is possible at this stage.

Stevenson101 SG

Wow China is propping up governments that are immoral but are loyal to the Chinese regime, i wonder where they've learned that one from ?

Acidshuriken SG

they are a huge embarrassment. asean should disown that useless rogue country.

Ah Chia SG

It's a sad thing to see humanity devolve into a system where financial benefits have to be reaped before a helping hand is given.

State to state relations are usually like that, but people to people relations depends on the situation.

im waiting for a revolution

a revolution where the myanmar people rise to topple the government

Me too.

But in Singapore.

Wow China is propping up governments that are immoral but are loyal to the Chinese regime, i wonder where they've learned that one from ?

Oldest game in the world.

Arapahoe SG

An Asean predicament........

YANGON - Myanmar's military government has "strongly rejected" a statement by the Association of Southeast Asian nations condemning the trial of pro-democracy leader Aung San Suu Kyi, state media said Monday.

Myanmar accused Thailand, which issued the statement one week ago as the rotating chairman of the 10-member bloc, of interfering in its internal affairs, the New Light of Myanmar newspaper reported.

"This statement issued by the alternate ASEAN chairman -- which is not in conformity with ASEAN practice, incorrect in facts, interfering in the internal affairs of Myanmar -- is strongly rejected by Myanmar," it said

the only way out is a regime change......

Chew Bakar SG

Sacking Myanmar from Asean might be a good option.

Arapahoe SG

Provide covert funding for a military coup within the military Junta.....bring up a moderate General that would allow political transition.

Chew Bakar SG

Provide covert funding for a military coup within the military Junta.....bring up a moderate General that would allow political transition.

Another junta will go the same way as the old. Just a change of face but not rule.