dd
I break your questions into 4 parts
1.Artificial
means to increase Singapore's GDP through assimilation of foreign
talents,domestic demand
U need confidences of INVESTORS and BANKS to set up a company in
SG
to provide jobs for FT as well as locals.i dunt think the
gavaman controlled
DBS would blindly hand out loans to comanies just to window
dressing
SG FIXED INVESTMENTS and GDP!!Basically all the investments are
market driven.
Gavamnna incentives just a small boost.All PAP sponored
companies
will fall if there is no long term demand.
Wat are the opportunity costs and alternatives of the factors of
productions
of these companies majority taken up by FT,say dockyards,wafer
factory,
cleaning ?They just cotinue to be a piece of empty land or
sea!!
Domestic
demand
Who can give u more $$ to boost domestic demand?The tax
payers!!
or Oz gavaman start to print more currency!!
2.What we have
built up for 12 years, we lost half of the GDP over Australia in 3
months. All because of the economic machinations of a little
dictator. 
wat do u mean?Oz just too shy to show her own GDO accumulative
GDP growth in
this figyre.i can tell u this is abt 55% for oz from 1996 to end
2008 .
So,let say SG GDP drop 10 % in 2009 and Oz remain unchanged,
SG grew 77 % and Oz grew 55 % from 1996 to end 2009.
3.Believe me
when I say, Singapore is still not out of the woods yet, with US
unemployment rate at 9.4%, the global demand is going to remain
sluggish for years to come.
Only SG leader dared to challenge Obama ''green shot ''
hope.
If SG is not out of woods yet,who can be out of woods??
4.When you
have 100 citizens (being paid $1,500) working in your
factory, you produce say $18 million worth of goods. When you
employ another 100 foreign talents ($750), you will produce another
$18 million worth of goods, making a total of $36 million. You
don't need too much intelligence to decipher this, only basic
arithmetic which I hope you are capable of.
Pl see my answer in Q1.On the whole ,it is better with
higher GDP than
lower.Pl share with me wat is the overall good points to have a
LOWER GDP?
BTW,is it easy to get confidence of both the Board of Directors
of MNC
and the banks to committee
and grant loans billons of dollars in mega projects in SG?
The recovery period is 10 to 20 years.This is NOT a one-
night-stand
investment,like in stocks and bonds,where u can withdraw in
overnight!!
nnn
1) FT provide jobs for Singaporeans? Stop regurgitating MIW crap
and start using your mane, oops I meant your brain.
If your logic is correct, then USA would probably encourage more
foreign labours. If your logic was correct, then perhaps Singapore
should let in more foreign labours so that they can reduce the
unemployment to 0%.
So is your logic sound?
And you believe that Singapore has long term domestic demand?
The U.S. Senate voted on February 6 to limit the number of
high-skilled foreign workers to be hired by recipients of the
Troubled Asset Relief Program. Many TARP recipients had hoped to
use
bailout money to
hire cheap foreign labor and bring them to the United States via
H-1B visas. Seeing this potential problem, the Senate has put
restrictions on the amount of overseas labor which can be
employed.
Well over
600,000 employees were laid off in January 2009
and 2.6 million people lost their jobs in 2008 nationwide. To stem
the tide of rising job losses, the Senate chose a course of action
which it hopes will encourage the hiring of American workers. This
provision is in essence a “buy American” clause for corporate
America. Congress holds the purse-strings for the remaining bailout
funding, and is likely to put more restrictions on it in the
future.
The
amendment requires that any company hiring
foreign workers gives a substantial reason for not hiring an
American for that position. It also protects American workers from
being replaced by cheap foreign imports.
http://www.economyincrisis.org/articles/show/2451
Domestic demand means spending in the domestic market moron, it
does not mean government coming out money to bail out. Singapore's
market is predominantly export oriented. Why you may ask? This is
because the majority of Singaporeans lack the funds to spend, the
majority of funds is with the government. When government has the
funds, means no funds for your multiplier effect. What is
multiplier effect? When a hawker makes $5,000, he needs to spend
maybe $3,000 to pay off his workers, perishable goods, rental and
electricity. The money circulates within the economy.
Why do you think that other countries are less affected by the
global recession? It's because they have their own domestic demand
unlike Singapore which predominantly relies on export markets.
2. You have problems understanding then get an English teacher
to explain to you.
Artificial means to increase Singapore's GDP through
assimilation of foreign talents has brought about more adverse
effects in the GDP. Singapore's GDP dropped 10.1% for the 1st
quarter of 2009, whereas Australia's GDP dropped only 0.1% for that
quarter (or increased 0.3% on an annual basis). Singapore has
little domestic demand as compared to Australia, because most of
it's funds are in the hands of the goverment. The government then
uses these funds to make retarded investments overseas losing SG$
100 billion.
What we have built up for 12 years, we lost half of the GDP over
Australia in 3 months. All because of the economic machinations of
a little dictator. 
Believe me when I say, Singapore is still not out of the woods
yet, with US unemployment rate at 9.4%, the global demand is going
to remain sluggish for years to come.
SG$ 100 billion can buy Singaporeans 40 billion packs of
economical rice, based on say a population size of 3 million,
this means that 3 million citizens can get food (2 meals a day)
without work for 18 years.
http://www.singstat.gov.sg/
http://www.abs.gov.au/AUSSTATS/[email protected]/mf/1345.0?opendocument?utm_id=LN
