want to migrate pls migrate
dun keep die die dunwan migrate, then whine like a sad loser
That is a very reactionary view fostered by repressive rule.
Before the War of Resistance, there was a great deal of talk
about national subjugation. Some said, "China is inferior in arms
and is bound to lose in a war." Others said, "If China offers armed
resistance, she is sure to become another Abyssinia." Since the
beginning of the war, open talk of national subjugation has
disappeared, but secret talk, and quite a lot of it too, still
continues. For instance, from time to time an atmosphere of
compromise arises and the advocates of compromise argue that "the
continuance of the war spells subjugation".[1] In a letter from Hunan a student has
written:
In the countryside everything seems difficult.
Doing propaganda work on my
own, I have to talk to people when and where I find them. The
people I have talked to are by no means ignoramuses; they all have
some understanding of what is going on and are very interested in
what I have to say. But when I run into my own relatives, they
always say: "China cannot win; she is
doomed." They make one sick ! Fortunately,
they do not go around spreading their views, otherwise things would
really be bad. The peasants would naturally put more stock in what
they say.
Such exponents of the theory of China's inevitable subjugation
form the social basis of the tendency to compromise. They are to be found
everywhere in China, and therefore the
problem of compromise is liable to crop up within the anti-Japanese
front at any time and will probably remain with us right until the
end of the war. Now that Hsuchow has fallen and Wuhan is in danger,
it will not be unprofitable, I think, to knock the bottom out of
the theory of national subjugation...
Do we deny the danger of
national subjugation? No, we do not. We
recognize that China faces two possible prospects, liberation or
subjugation, and that the two are in violent conflict. Our task is
to achieve liberation and to avert subjugation. The conditions for
liberation are China's progress, which is basic, the enemy's
difficulties, and international support. We differ from the
subjugationists.
Taking an objective and all-sided view, we recognize the two
possibilities of national subjugation and liberation, stress that
liberation is the dominant possibility, point out the conditions
for its achievement, and strive to secure them.
The subjugationists, on the
other hand, taking a subjective and one-sided view, recognize only
one possibility, that of subjugation; they do not admit the
possibility of liberation, and still less point out the conditions
necessary for liberation or strive to secure
them.
Moreover, while acknowledging the tendency to compromise and the
corruption, we see other tendencies and
phenomena which, we indicate, will gradually prevail and are
already in violent conflict with the former;
in addition, we point out the conditions necessary for the healthy
tendencies and phenomena to prevail, and we strive to overcome the
tendency to compromise and to change the state of corruption.
Therefore, contrary to the
pessimists, we are not at all
down-hearted...
http://www.marxists.org/reference/archive/mao/selected-works/
