If other political party rule Singapore continously for 50
years,
would SG become better or worse in the followings aspects?
This may be a meaningless or meaningful question.
1.Infant mortality rate
Singapore in the
lowest in the world!!Why?SG just become a First World
10 to 20 years ago?
2.GDP per capita is not
everythings.But without high GDP,
u will face a lot of problems.How on earth SG can become one
of the top GDP per capita without
natural resources?
https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/rankorder/2091rank.html
10 years ago,SG needed to import half of the water.
If u look at the list of top GDP and tick away those countries
below
1 million,SG become 2 nd in GDP per capita,after Norway,
a very natural resourceful country!!
3.Where did the money come
from to ''help'' western falling giants?
A resourceless and small country can buy MNC.This is
amazing!!
We pay high salary to political leaders.But in exchange,SG get
billions
of dollars of public money for next generations.Other
countries
do the politically correct things by paying low salary to their
leaders.
But i think u know wat are the consequences.sorry i mean
USA and UK,
not third world countries!!
@@@@@@@@@@
There are many items.I am afraid u guys will fall asleep.
There may be too many people critize PAP shall do this or shall
not do that
in the past 50 years.
Do they know in running a country or a company,big or small,
you just pick the best
policy or best option and DO it.
The rest you just let the Almighty to decide.
All policy are good and bad,depending on how u look at it.
As a leader,u have to pick the best option,even though this is a
very
politically INCORRECT and unpleasant!!
PAP just gambled her future by enforcing some unpleasant
policy,
like NS,foreign labours etc.