yer estimation was incorrect initially??
see!!!evryone including u make mistakes!
SO WHAT IS THIS???WHATS THIS HERE???I DUN SEE THE SOLUTION TO
CREATE A BETTER SINGAPORE!!ALL I SEE ARE PEOPLE FIGHTING AMONGST
THEMSELVES!!
WHO WILL SOLVE THE JOB PROBLEMS EVEN WHEN ECONOMY IS
GOOD.....
WHO WILL SOLVE THE CONTINOUS BAD INVESTMENTS AND POOR EFFICIENT
USE OF COUNTRYS RESERVES????
PRESENT GOVERNMNET PEOPLE AT TOP ARE OUT OF TUNE AND NEEEDS
RECALIBRATION IF POSSIBLE!
PRESENTLY TO ME,THEY SEEM LIKE A GUY WHO IS SOOOO RICH
UNTIL HE CAN BUY AN EMPTY TIN BOX FROM SWITZERLAND!TOO MUCH
MONEY...N DUNNO HOW N WHEN TO SPEND!
GOVERNMENT OF SINGAPORE HAVE LOST TOUCH WITH
REALITY.....VERY SAD FOR ALL SINGAPOREANS!
AND CAN YOU STOP BITCHIN N FIGHTIN AMONGST YERSELVES JUST
BECAUSE YER SLIPPER IS BETTER QUALITY THAN THE OTHER
PERSON!
Maybe ask xtreyier. He claims to be the hero who'll go
down fighting to save Singapore. 
Anyway, it wasn't a mistake. That was simply the first
half-intelligent thing you've said so far, and that earned you a
few points.
Who will solve the job problems? The people will, of
course, as long as they're allowed to. Then again, when
people like Sim Wong Hoo get boxed in by petty bureaucrats and a
population that's been made too brain-dead to recognise the promise
of new ideas, do you think they're allowed to?
As for investments, hey, everyone took a beating on the
market. Still, turkeys who screw up really shouldn't be kept
around on the basis of who they share a bed with -
performance-based tenure is the only way to go.
It's not so much that the government is out of tune; it more
that they're too frightened of not having absolute control.
Look, there's no denying that Western democracies can resemble
circuses a good part of the time; for one politician who says
something, there'll be one who says the complete opposite and it
often turns out to be a bad joke. Round these parts, Turnbull might
be a real dickhead today, but flip a coin to find out if it'll be
Rudd's turn tomorrow.
However, it take real balls to allow competing views to share
the stage, and even more intestinal fortitude to really take
alternative views aboard and weigh them equally against one's
original stance. The light at the end of that tunnel is a set
of decisions that is more sound because it has gone through the
checks and balances of a system for testing ideas and
assumptions.
The question is, is the Singaporean government clinging too
tightly to it's perception that it has to be right 100% of the
time, or does it have the confidence to open its decisions to
scrutiny? Right now it's the latter, and that one-sidedness
is the flat tyre that the country is currently running on.
Anyway, more points to you. You're actually looking at the
issues instead of running around trying to slap gag orders on all
and sundry.