Investments in Merril Lynch making money for Temasek

last SG · 2008-03-08T05:50:14+00:00

oei hong leong is suing citi for his loses, who can citizens aka taxpayers sue for Temasek's losses?

TCH05 SG

Finally you got a bit more.

The purpose is to point out to you that you have put words into others mouth. If I have said a triangle doesn't think like circle and square, it does not mean the circle and square think alike. Yet you are now claiming that I am saying that a circle and square think alike.

Understand this simple logic now?

Please dont avoid my question. What is the purpose of you saying that a triangle doesnt thinks like a circle and square, when at the same time you are claiming that a circle and square doesnt think alike?

Plus, how on earth are you able to relate that to me putting words in your mouth?

I suspect there might be too much rubbish coming out of your mouth that is why you always feel that some foreign particles are stucked inside there. Or am I supposed to read between the lines again?

eagle SG

Plus, how on earth are you able to relate that to me putting words in your mouth?

I suspect there might be too much rubbish coming out of your mouth that is why you always feel that some foreign particles are stucked inside there. Or am I supposed to read between the lines again?

I have already answered your question. Do I need to repeat? Especially when you cannot prove two things convincingly:

1) that the word 'us' was only referring to both Andrew and me.
2) that I have said that Andrew and I think alike.

Or are you really just being dumb not to even comprehend simple logic? Need I draw a Venn Diagram out for you?

Uncle Ver SG SG

Since when is Warren Buffett a big fan of Singapore Inc.? He is a Democrat who made his money WITHOUT state connections and hates nespotism to the extent he doesnt give his children any money at all.

TCH05 SG

I have already answered your question. Do I need to repeat? Especially when you cannot prove two things convincingly:

1) that the word 'us' was only referring to both Andrew and me.
2) that I have said that Andrew and I think alike.

Or are you really just being dumb?

Calling me dumb or stupid will not make your statement look any smarter.

When you say TCH doesnt thinks like US (which represent Eagle and Andrew) and Eagle doesnt thinks like Andrew

what exactly are you trying to say?

eagle SG

Calling me dumb or stupid will not make your statement look any smarter.

When you say TCH doesnt thinks like US (which represent Eagle and Andrew) and Eagle doesnt thinks like Andrew

what exactly are you trying to say?

You are really acting dumb because you cannot understand simple logic.

I'm complimenting you (already mentioned earlier).

Next I will foresee you will want to ask how is it a compliment. Thinking differently means you can see things in different and interesting perspectives, something that both of us might not be able to see, even though our perspectives may already be different. A 3rd one is always welcomed.

A simple venn diagram for you:

I think A, Andrew think B, you think C. Between Andrew and I, we might only share both ideas A and B, but with you thinking differently, all of us share ideas A, B and C; we have more opinions.

Don't you agree now that you have put words into my mouth by saying that I have said me and Andrew thinks alike, i.e. we both think A?

Gosh, compliment you also need to explain to you.

TCH05 SG

Please dont avoid my question.

I am asking you, what is the PURPOSE of making the statement that TCH doesnt thinks like Eagle and Andrew, and Eagle doesnt thinks like Andrew. I repeat, the PURPOSEof your statement. NOT if your statement is true or false.

Btw, among AnC, BnC and AnB, which one is bigger?

Plus I would appreciate if you dont simply assume BnC and AnC, because that is quite insulting.

eagle SG

Please dont avoid my question.

Btw, among AnC, BnC and AnB, which one is bigger?

Plus I would appreciate if you dont simply assume BnC and AnC, because that is quite insulting.

Please take some to read again to see that your question has been answered both on page 3 and 4. The purpose has been stated 3 times. Please look back at page 3 and look again at page 4. Or do I need to quote all the replies I have made to your question?

TCH05 SG

Please dont avoid my question.

I repeat, what is the PURPOSE of you saying TCH doesnt thinks like US (which represent Eagle and Andrew), and at the same time claiming that Eagle doesnt thinks like Andrew? Remember I am asking the PURPOSE of your statement, NOT if it is right or wrong.

Eagle :

Somehow he also put words into my mouth in other threads.

But to be fair, it may be because he thinks in a different way from US, which is btw, a compliment.

TCH :

I am glad that you admit that you and andrewpkyap think alike. you are a very honest young man.

Eagle :

You think different from us is not the same as we think alike.
It is just like a I'm a circle, Andrew is a square and you are a triangle. You are different from us, but it does not mean we are alike in any way.

TCH :

what is the point of saying that a triangle think differently from circle and square when circle and square doesnt even think alike.

Mind explaining to us what is the underlying purpose is saying what you said? Can i assume that you are offended when I say AndrewPKyap thinks like you?

eagle SG

1) I have already stated the purpose both in page 3 and 4. It is just that you are blind or senile. And I have already thrown the question back to you: Do you need me to requote all the previous posts I have made that state the purpose? Do you?

2) You have obviously put words in my mouth. No matter the underlying purpose, by asking me

what is the PURPOSE of you saying TCH doesnt thinks like US (which represent Eagle and Andrew), and at the same time claiming that Eagle doesnt thinks like Andrew

are you admitting that you are putting words in my mouth in page 3 when you claimed that I have said both me and Andrew think alike?

Note: You are claiming that I have said both me and Andrew think alike. Do not try to twist the direction to you questioning me on the purpose of my sentence, which I have already stated long ago. We have not settled the first claim yet, so please do not avoid it.

TCH05 SG

1) I have already stated the purpose both in page 3 and 4. It is just that you are blind or senile. And I have already throw the question back to you: Do you need me to requote all the previous posts I have made that state the purpose? Do you?

2) You are putting words in my mouth. No matter the underlying purpose, by asking me

are you admitting that you are putting words in my mouth in page 3 when you claimed that I have said both me and Andrew think alike?

Note: You are claiming that I have said both me and Andrew think alike. Do not try to twist the direction to you questioning me on the purpose of my sentence, which I have already stated long ago. We have not settled the first claim yet, so please do not avoid it.

Nah, please dont avoid answering my question by referring me to page 3 and 4 or whatever. If you can afford the time to discuss this over 2 pages, I am sure you should have time to answer to my simply question.

Please tell me, what is the PURPOSE of your making the statement that TCH doesnt thinks like US (which represent Eagle and Andrew), and at the same time claiming that Eagle doesnt thinks like Andrew?

And please dont try to avoid my question by asking more questions which IMO is irrelevant to our discussion.

Old habits die hard dont they? Are you going to start asking me about weight lifting next?

eagle SG

Please tell me, what is the PURPOSE of your making the statement that TCH doesnt thinks like US (which represent Eagle and Andrew), and at the same time claiming that Eagle doesnt thinks like Andrew?

And please dont try to avoid my question by asking more questions which IMO is irrelevant to our discussion.

Old habits die hard dont they? Are you going to start asking me about weight lifting next?

You are still avoiding my challenge on your claim. Please settle it first. Why raise more questions when you cannot even prove your first claim? Please follow the order. You are obviously trying to twist the challenge away.

And if you cannot even bring yourself to read page 3 and 4 to recap on what was said, you are obviously just shooting off aimlessly.

eagle SG

Oh ya, you can afford the time to discuss this over 2 pages, I am sure you should have time to read through again pages 3 and 4 for answers to your question.

eagle SG

And I really cannot imagine how someone who have read, and quoted the answer to his question, can continue to ask the question. Poor comprehension or just plain dumb?

Proof:

Question: Mind explaining to us what is the underlying purpose of saying what you said?

Proof2:

So mind explaining to everyone why you are continuously demanding an answer to a question already answered (and you have already quoted)?

TCH05 SG

And if you cannot even bring yourself to read page 3 and 4 to recap on what was said, you are obviously just shooting off aimlessly.

Eagle, I wish to remind you again that I am fully aware of your old habits of using questions to avoid question. so please stop doing that, it is extremely childish.

Talk about order, may i suggest that you read this entire thread again and tell me if my question to you about the purpose of you making that dumb and meaningless statement come first, or your stupid question which you claimed you asked.

Instead of wasting my time, please tell me, what is the purpose of you making the statement that TCH doesnt thinks like US (which represent Eagle and Andrew), and at the same time claiming that Eagle doesnt thinks like Andrew?

eagle SG

Eagle, I wish to remind you again that I am fully aware of your old habits of using questions to avoid question. so please stop doing that, it is extremely childish.

And I really cannot imagine how someone who have read, and quoted the answer to his question, can continue to ask the question. Poor comprehension or just plain dumb?

Proof:

Question: Mind explaining to us what is the underlying purpose of saying what you said?

Proof2:

So mind explaining to everyone why you are continuously demanding an answer to a question already answered (and you have already quoted)?

I believe you cannot read well, so I shall requote for you. No point avoiding this post. Are you trying to stroke your ego or? Isn't the answer blatantly staring at you?

And TCH, it is your habit to twist challenges away when you cannot prove it. You made a claim, I challenge it. So why no reply to it? Have you silently admitted that you put words into my mouth?

I wish to remind you again that I am fully aware of your old habits of using questions to avoid question.

Please also explain why you have continuously avoided answering whether you admit putting words into my mouth by asking another question like what is the purpose of my sentence. If you did not even understand the purpose originally, why state your claim? Why even make your post in page 3?

eagle SG

TCH, I wish to remind you that you are clearly avoiding my challenge to your claim by claiming that I am avoiding your question.

TCH05 SG

I believe you cannot read well, so I shall requote for you. No point avoiding this post. Are you trying to stroke your ego or?

Eagle, if you are a man, I believe you should do what your said about following order, so please answer to my question and stop trying to cover up your nonsense with more nonsense

what is the purpose of you making the statement that TCH doesnt thinks like US (which represent Eagle and Andrew), and at the same time claiming that Eagle doesnt thinks like Andrew?

TCH05 SG

TCH, I wish to remind you that you are clearly avoiding my challenge to your claim by claiming that I am avoiding your question.

Please follow order!!

Please follow the order. You are obviously trying to twist the challenge away.

eagle SG

Please follow order!!

Order history:
6 hours ago
Eagle:
Another perfect example of you putting words into others mouth. Different from us doesn't mean I think the same as him.

4 hours ago
TCH05:
what is the point of saying that a triangle think differently from a circle and square when circle and square doesnt even think alike.

Yup.

Please follow order!

eagle SG

Eagle, if you are a man, I believe you should do what your said about following order, so please answer to my question and stop trying to cover up your nonsense with more nonsense

what is the purpose of you making the statement that TCH doesnt thinks like US (which represent Eagle and Andrew), and at the same time claiming that Eagle doesnt thinks like Andrew?

Please don't avoid the challenge I made to you and your failed attempt to prove otherwise 6 hours ago.

And regarding the bolded question, I have already explained many times in this thread. You have to state why the answers are not satisfactorily enough. Or maybe you cannot read?

« Previous Page Next Page »