http://kentridgecommon.com/?p=2544
Of migration and the Singaporean diaspora
By Kelvin Teo ⋅ April 14, 2009
SINGAPORE – A survey conducted by the
Singapore Polytechnic revealed one sobering statistic – more than
50% of youths aged between 15 and 29 years old want to migrate
overseas if given the chance. Another ironic piece of statistic is
that despite going through National Education in their schools, 37%
admitted that they are not patriotic. Another interesting number is
that despite 60% of the youth not being interested in local
politics, half of them want to see more opposition in
parliament.
And this migration statistic is worrying our leaders. Senior
Minister (SM) Goh Chok Tong admitted in a meeting with Iranian
leaders that Singapore is leaking talents, especially the top notch
ones. And this leakage of talents extended to the civil service as
well. This was ironic considering the fact that SM Goh fired a
rhetorical salvo in challenging Singaporeans’ resolve to stay to
fight for the nation instead of taking flight at the first sign of
trouble, ending with a famous question – “are you a quitter or a
stayer?”
Admittedly, this rhetorical question triggered an emotional
response. The quitter reference didn’t go down well amongst a
number of Singaporeans, especially those who have migrated or have
already considered migrating. A variety of reasons were offered to
explain their unhappiness. Be that as it may, sometimes it would be
interesting to dwell on the causes behind Singaporeans’ decision to
migrate rather than the furore over the stayer-quitter remarks.
Mr Seah Chiang Nee, in an article published in the Sunday Star,
attributed one of the causes to a self-centred generation with no
personal bond to the nation. Half of it is figured by Mr Seah. The
other half is possibly attributable to the fact that Singaporeans
are rarely offered a part to play in the running of the nation.
Singapore has always been run in a top-down approach, the catch
phrase for that is a paternalistic form of governance. Basically,
Singaporeans have not much say in the running of Singapore.
Thus, there is a need to engage Singaporeans in the sense that
they should be given a say in the direction that Singapore should
take, and in doing so, shoulder more responsibilities. When
citizens are given more responsibilities in running the country
within a decentralized system of governance, the national bond
naturally comes. In fact, this engagement should be extended to
Singaporeans who have left our shores.
The case study of India has taught us that despite the brain
drain, the Indian diaspora worldwide has benefitted India in terms
of cash injection and technology transfer. It would be tragic if
the Singapore government fails to engage the Singaporean diaspora
worldwide.
One solution to the brain drain in SM Goh’s words is “to turn to
talented people from other countries, get them to work here and
eventually turn them into Singaporeans”. That in itself is a gamble
because not all foreigners would end up taking up Singapore
citizenship.
However, the pertinent question is – has the government
completely forgotten the former sons of Singapore? It appeared that
SM Goh’s reference to them as “quitters” will only further alienate
them. One really wonders if it has ever occurred to the Singapore
government that the Singapore diaspora worldwide can still be
considered a valuable resource in terms of knowledge and finance.
Even SM Goh conceded that these talented former Singaporeans are
“harvested straightaway by top companies and institutions”. Thus,
wouldn’t a friendly engagement allow Singapore to tap on their
expertise or benefit from their cash injection? Alienation would
only burn the bridges for eternity.
When there was talk about building up a knowledge-based economy,
the government rolled out the red carpet in welcoming foreign
luminaries. Perhaps, the same red carpet should also be rolled out
to welcome overseas-based Singaporean or ex-Singaporean experts
too.
Prime Minister Mr Lee Hsien Loong envisioned Singapore as “an
inclusive society where no one will be left behind”. It is a
beautiful vision worth attaining. However, former Singaporeans
should also be included in this vision. Even as they have left our
shores, they are still a part of us nonetheless. Instead of burning
bridges, more bridges should be built to reach out to such
Singaporeans.
Latest Updates At Singapore News Alternative:
1. Singapore suffers record contraction
2. Anarchy in Streets Builds When GDP Isn’t
Shared
3. UBS Expect To Post US$1.75 Billion Losses
For 1st Quarter
4. Hong Kong Beat Singapore In Foreign Trade Survey
5. Singapore Retail Sales Fall Further In February
6. Of migration and the Singaporean diaspora
.