since sooner or later ,some one will mention Lim Ching
Siong,
i bring up his name so u guy can compare Chia and Lim.
I remember two sons of Lim were trained as doctors in SG!!
If only the noisy pussy could have been more honest with himself
instead of swallowing the trash that he hungers and simply
regurgitate.
If is doubtful if the noisy pussy have the talent
to learnt from others, who have taken the trouble to find out
the truth - ‘Confuscius at Oxford: Singapore History
I’.
LKY should have kept his obituary for himself - as he has become
an expert in the dictatorial aspects of Communist Rule than even
the Communists have been.
He had outlasted the Communists and Marxists empires and
dictators, which even resulted in the leaders of
Communist China sending political study groups to visit
Singapore - to learn how LKY and his PAP has been able to
maintain its ONE Party status for so long.
‘Was Lim Chin Siong really a Communist
?’
Sadly, as far as LKY is concerned everyone and anyone
- who will challenge him is a Communist - except for
himself.
It is interesting to note that all official
historical records kept in the archives of the British
Colonial Office had shown the Lim Chin Siong was not a
Communist.
He was a Nationalist and an anti-Colonialist - as it was common
in the 1950s, which led him to be investigated and cleared by
the British Special Branch.
Only the schemer in LKY had attempted to use the
British Colonial Government and the Special Branch to have Lim Chin
Siong arrested, while LKY can keep his image of respectability when
facing Lim Chin Siong - whom LKY had introduced as the Future Prime
Minister of Singapore.
‘Political History of Singapore – 1950s
’
In his
memoirs, Lee wrote that "Lim Chin Siong wanted to eliminate the
Internal Security Council because he knew that…if it ordered the
arrest and detention of the communist leaders, the Singapore
government could not be held responsible and be stigmatized a
colonial stooge."
What the Minister Mentor did not say, but what Harper reveals in
his chapter, is shockingly contradictory: "In mid-1961, therefore, to seek a way out, Lee
suggested to the British that his government should order the
release of all [the remaining] detainees, but then have that order
countermanded in the ISC by Britain and Malaya."
Such a craven act was even rebuffed by the British. The acting
Commissioner, Philip Moore, stated that the British should not be
"party to a device for
deliberate
misrepresentation of responsibility for continuing
detentions in order to help the PAP government remain in
power." (emphasis added)
Moore suggested that the best solution would be "to release all the
detainees forthwith." Lee, however, "was unwilling to present the
left with such a victory."
In a most damning indictment, Moore said that Lee "has lived a lie about the detainees for too
long, giving the Party the impression that he was
pressing for their release while, in fact, agreeing in the ISC that
they should remain in detention."
And if one thought
that Lee Kuan Yew could not sink any lower, he
did.
He
turned to his saviours and warned that should he lose in an
upcoming by-election, he would call for a general election, which
he fully expected to lose.
This was because he was
facing defections in the Legislative Assembly on
his refusal to release the remaining detainees. And should he lose
the elections, he warned the colonial masters, David Marshall, Ong
Eng Guan and Lim Chin Siong would form the next government.
This, he calculated, would be so distasteful to the British that it
would rally them to his side.
He presented the scheme at
a dinner with Commissioner Lord Selkirk, Philip Moore (Selkirk's
deputy), and Goh Keng Swee:
Lee
would order the release of the prisoners, the British
would stop it through the ISC, and he would then announce a
referendum on merger with Malaya (the story behind merger is
explained below).
‘A Comet in Our Sky ’
