If Hamas had abandoned its ambition of destroying Israel, would
there be any killings of any number of people ?
If Hamas had been able to exercise strategic wisdom and
smarter tactics in their confrontation with Israel, would there be
any large number of deaths on the Palestinian side compared to the
Israelis ?
Sadly, Hamas had even admitted that they were surprised and had
not expected such determined ferocity in Israeli response.
This clearly showed that Hamas was not prepared and had expected
business to be as usual, where they can expect to continue firing
rockets and missile into Israel at random and at their own choosing
without any warnings.
Osama bin Ladin might as well borrow your intellect in
protesting that after the 9-11 World Trade Center destruction
- USA's right to hunt down Al Qaeda and Osama should stop
when 500+ Afghans have been killed.
Unfortunately, Hamas will not borrow your line of argument
as their agenda is to win the psychological propaganda war
over the Israelis - by causing as many Palestinian casualties
as possible after each intentional attack towards Israel.
You said it so well in your statement - "Hamas provoked Israel
to retaliate, yet it is Israel that is doing the actual
killing".
Is Israel the only one guilty of the killing, or is Hamas not
equally guilty for causing the casualties and deaths amongst the
innocent Palestinians - by attacking Israel from densely
populated areas of Palestinian residences, refugee camps and
schools ?
Have you not succumbed to propaganda - which is "Hamas
organised effort to promote a particular belief" - that
Israelis are massacreing the Palestinians ?
Are you not regurgitating what is being repeated on behalf of
Hamas - despite your declared efforts of being a neutral ?
When Iraq and Iran was fighting the seven year war, French
companies were in Iran exploring oil and gas.
When the USA was conducting its 'shock and awe' campaign
during Dessert Storm I and II - oil companies were continuously
pumping out crude in the region.
Is there any to be had, when all that exist is nothing more
than hot gas ?
If Hamas had been able to exercise strategic wisdom and
smarter tactics in their confrontation with Israel, would there be
any large number of deaths on the Palestinian side compared to the
Israelis ?
How would you advise the vastly
outnumbered and outgunned Hamas to wage war
against Israel, the Middle-East's superpower? Let's hear some of
your "strategic wisdom".
Osama bin Ladin might as well borrow your intellect in
protesting that after the 9-11 World Trade Center destruction
- USA's right to hunt down Al Qaeda and Osama should stop
when 500+ Afghans have been killed.
This is totally unrelated, but
I'll address it anyway. If the US wanted to catch Bin Laden, it had
plenty of chances to do so. After the 1993 WTC bombings,
Clinton let him escape after receiving an offer from Sudan to
extradite him. Then when the Taliban made the Bush
Administration an offer after 9/11,
the US refused. After all, the war plans for the invasion of
Afghanistan were already prepared before 9/11 and troops were
already massing across the Afghan border. That's because Bin
Laden's just another CIA front that was hired back during the
Afghan-Soviet war.
In fact, a day before 9/11, Bin Laden was in a military hospital in
Pakistan receiving medical treatment. Dont forget that the CIA
and ISI have a rich history of cooperation starting from the
Afghan-Soviet war up till this day.
Is Israel the only one guilty of the killing, or is Hamas
not equally guilty for causing the casualties and deaths amongst
the innocent Palestinians - by attacking Israel from densely
populated areas of Palestinian residences, refugee camps and
schools ?
No, as I have said many times,
both parties are guilty of bloodshed. If everyone agreed on
that, instead of trying to condemn one side alone, then
there would not be any need to argue on this issue. Would
you tell me where in Gaza is it not densely packed? I dont know,
but if you can make such a statement, then you must know right?
They dont have HDBs for the 1.5 million people there.
Have you not succumbed to propaganda - which is "Hamas
organised effort to promote a particular belief" - that
Israelis are massacreing the Palestinians ?
While "propaganda" does not have
any negative denotations, I know that people like to use it to
connote lies and misinformation. "Propaganda" is a technical word.
I dont think Hamas can wage an effective media war because they
dont have the means to do so, unlike Israel, which has taken the
media war to Youtube. Anyway, how is it not true that Israel is NOT
masscreing Palestinians? Your very stand is based on Israeli
propaganda. How are you different?
When Iraq and Iran was fighting the seven year war, French
companies were in Iran exploring oil and gas.
When the USA was conducting its 'shock and awe'
campaign during Dessert Storm I and II - oil companies were
continuously pumping out crude in the region.
Gaza is in a totally different
context. As you know, Hamas does not have anything that resembles a
national military. But how are you proving that oil and natural gas
doesn't exist when you're just using your preconception that it
does not exist to prove it doesn't exist? In the first place,
you're not prepared to accept that. I also dont know very much
about this, I've just read this information recently. And of course
I would believe it until I read anything credible to the
contrary.