The right-wings will claim that it's the old man's fault that he
didn't plan for his old age when he was younger and his ability to
earn was much higher, resulting in today's situation.
The left-wings will claim it's the government's fault for not
providing a social safety net for these old folks. They love to use
this example to start espousing on the greater income disparity and
so on and so forth.
At the end of the day, who is right? The left-wingers or the
right-wingers?
Let me tell you, there's no winner at the end of the day. The
old man is the real loser.
While you people debate about toppling this current regime or
blaming the old man for his lack of foresigh, he still has to live
on his meagre $150 every month.
Really, sometimes, is politicking really so enjoyable? To the
point where we start associating this with the oversight and
failings of the PAP and even to Temasek Holdings' fault?
So what if you win? So what if you topple the regime? So what if
you discredit Temasek Holdings?
At the end of the day, this old man will still live on
anonymously and someday will pass on without so much as a miniscule
effect on the lives of others. Does it occur to both sides that we
should start solving the problem and stop pinpointing the source of
the blame?
What happened to realpolitik? Is it so unfashionable nowadays
that we have no choice but to keep asking 'why' it went wrong and
'who' is responsible for it instead of asking 'how' or 'what' we
can do to solve the problem?
Really. Speakers' Corner is not a place to play the blame game.
We need people to stop listing problems for the sake of finding
faults. We need them to provide some solutions as well.
Shame on those who politicised this issue. Shame on you.
x2!
You have my respect. May change come.