Really? So, expanding your logic further, did all governments whom
those they governed didn't like "had to run"? 
By insinuation and utilising your warped logic, would it
therefore not be logical to suggest all the governments that aren't
running are effectively governments well-endorsed and well-liked by
those they govern?
Speaking of which, so what's your disguised take on why should
it therefore not be laughable for a regime to sympathise with
victims of activities for which they too are perpetuators?
I am laughing
by looking back in history, not by any logical deduction. That
was what happened exactly. If it is not logical that "all
governments whom those they governed didn't like "had to run"",
then the brits government are not logical, , no
wonder those they governed didn't like them.
No need for any
insinutation, just need the brits to look into the mirror and come
to terms with what they did, and how much they are
liked.
You still think
that the young lady died because of what happened at home? unless
people like you come to accept reality, terrorism will
continue.
From the IRA
bombings, to the July 7 bombing in London, I guess you are used to
living in fear, but be careful, many south asians in your
neighborhood are not happy with how they are being treated, by
the regime, in an entire nation that is terrorized by the regime.
You people must be so used to mourning the victims of terrorism,
you even find it laughable, but do you realize that the victims of
terrorism are the victims of the regime itelf?
Now terrorisms
are exported overseas, 911 New York, 911 Mumbai, one thing in
common, they were both colonies of the brits, and the targets are
the same, the brits, doesn’t matter if you hold a different
passport or speak with a different accent!
Don’t laugh, or
your turn will come. when that happen, we won't mourn for you, but
we won't laugh, as a respect to your family.
