meritocracy means regardless of race, language, religion, and
family background. scholarship is definitely a by product of good
grades.
Your above two propositions conclude to a moot point unless
you're addled enough to claim that grades are barred by race,
language, religion or family background haha. Since grades are
achievable here solely on the ability and motivation of the
individual without racial, language, religion or family background
obstruction, and to you is one of the drivers to a scholarship,
your 1st sentence is the same as the second.
BTW, you are so clueless if you think that all you need are
"grades" for a scholarship in Singapore. I'm certain you do not
know any real ones (Scholars. REAL ones. SAFOS, President's, OMS
league. Not some lame duck, buay kan NUS bursary for the poor/study
award from SAF/Lelong healthcare/teaching award holders who call
themselves scholars).
The perfect scorers don't even get to the first rate
scholarships, they end up with the breadcrumbs like some stat board
or teaching award that no top leaguers covet. The all rounders with
near perfect scores AND mandatory ten thousand other things that
are NON-academic do get to compete in the final leg of the 1st/top
tier. Bloodbath begins and only a handful of the best men win.
The only fools who think that "best grades" = "best scholarship"
or "only grades required" = scholarship are the people outside
looking in who have never ever had a brush with the subject matter
they brazenly pontificate about, thinking that they're such
know-it-alls but of cos making big fools of themselves.
They're the people who went to below average JCs like VJ, NJ,
TJC and below, stayed in SG all their sad lives and attended some
village university like NUS arts and social science, had some fat
gay bf who didn't make it to OCS, never had spoke to a SAFOS or OMS
before in their lives. No interaction at all even mildly with the
"circle". And they think they know-it-all,,very sad.