This apology is a bit vague in my opinion.
It could be interpreted as Wong Kan Seng giving his
opinion on the incident.
He felt sorry that the incident occured.
It is a bit vague and unclear.
I think the apology should be stronger and more clear, for
example:
During a heated prime minister's questions session, Mr Brown
said: "I
profoundly regret and apologise for the inconvenience and worries
that have been caused to millions of families who receive child
benefits.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk
"We sincerely
apologise for any inconvenience and unhappiness caused to the
tourists," Au King-chi, Hong Kong commissioner for
tourism, told reporters.
http://www.theage.com.au/travel/travel-news
He said: "I've
apologised to Academi, I've also apologised to all the authors
involved and I've written to them today again to apologise. A
genuine mistake, a misunderstanding and as a minister I take full
responsibility for that."
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/poli
In a letter to shadow secretary of state for children, schools
and families Michael Gove, David Bell wrote: "The individuals concerned
have crossed the boundary of what would be expected of them under
the Civil Service Code. For that, as permanent secretary of this
department, I apologise."
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2008/11
Do you agree with my view Bentsb05, that the apology is a bit
vague?
'I am sorry for what happened' (Is what Poh Ah Pak wanted to
hear)
'I am sorry that it has happen' (What the nation got from
WKS)