Official story: 19 hijackers, 15 of them from Saudi Arabia,
hijacked four planes and crashed two of them into WTC 1 and 2,
collapsing them. One into the Pentagon. One crashed in
Pennsylvania.
Problem with official story #1: Some of the alleged hijackers
are still alive, reported the BBC
Problem #2: If 2 planes crashed into the Twin Towers, then what
caused WTC 7 to collapse in the same exact manner almost 8 hours
later?
Problem #3: Why did eye-witnesses report ground-level explosions
that totally wrecked the lobby of the Twin Towers?
Problem #4: If the jet fuel weakened the support structures of
the Twin Towers, then according to the official pancake theory, why
wasn't the steel core left standing? Instead, the steel cores were
photographed after the collapse as having been cut diagonally (by
thermite, thermite residue found by 9/11 researchers).
Problem #5: If a plane hit the Pentagon, then where is all the
debris, including the tail section, fuselage and especially the
engine made of titanium which couldnt have been destroyed by the
flames? And why was the hole made in the Pentagon not big enough
for a jet liner? What hit the Pentagon?
Problem #6: If the government's official story is true, then why
did the CIA/FBI confiscated all CCTV cameras around the Pentagon
immediately after the crash and refused to release them except for
5 frames, which is inconclusive?
Problem #7: If a plane crashed in Shanksville, Pennsylvania,
then again, where is all the debris and human bodies? Shouldnt
there be the wreckage? Go check out the photos. In fact, a cornerer
said that it wasnt a crime scene because there were no human
bodies.
Problem #8: Why did Dick Cheney order NORAD to stand-down when
it was known that hijacked planes were in the air?
Problem #9: What a coincidence that more than 6 anti-terrorist
exercises were taking place on 9/11 envisioning the same
scenario.
Problem #10: Why did the US Govt invade Afghanistan, blaming Bin
Laden for 9/11, when 1)war plans for the invasion already existed
before 9/11 and 2)the FBI does not list Bin Laden as responsible
for 9/11 because of lack of evidence.
So, given all these inconsistencies, the official story just
doesnt stand. It is more likely that it was another false-flag
operation carried out by the CIA/MI6/Mossad or a combination, to
set into motion global change, which we have experienced.
You mean conspiracy theory? No. I'm talking about conspiracy
fact. Before you switch off because you associate belief in
conspiracies with mental instability, perhaps you might want to
ponder those 10 problems with the official story.