in fact temasek failure is not without reason.
They just simply buy over a company which they deem profitable
or with potential to earn profits over a period of times. not
running the company.
this is very different from Buffet berkshire harthaway in which
some investment are made by restructing the company into a
profitable one.
not exactly a wrong approach, they've already showed themselves
to be quite destructive when managing temasek. maybe someone
decided to do things that way to make sure their "investments" as a
form of insurance to at least make sure their investments don't
need to earn, just don't lose as much can liao to counter the
ceo.
