.. as shown by the ongoing US presidential elections
campaign.
I just saw a video on youtube where they slammed obama for the
smallest and most insignificant of reasons, sometimes discrimatory
as well.
1. Questioning the fact that his middle name was Hussein and
that he spent 4 years in a muslim school and how making a mockery
of it.
2. Do you want a smoker as a president?, they asked.
3. When obama and his wife gave each other a friendly knuckle to
knuckle punch, FOX news questioned if it was a TERRORIST FIST.
fucking absurd.
And if i'm not wrong, fox news was the one that reported the
collapse of one of the buildings during 9/11 15 minutes BEFORE it
actually happened. Basically FOX is just a lap dog for bush to
use.
not going to argue about the rest. but one thing that struck me
about your list is 2) he is a smoker.
what's wrong with that question? him being a smoker will most
likely have an impact on the tabacco laws. That's an issue some
pple are concerned with.
smoking is technically an addiction. so would you question the
choice if the candidate is a drug addict? Nicotine's a drug right?
(N.B. actually I have no issue with drug addicts if they are able
to function normally and well when needed to. But most pple just
have issues with drug addicts, whether or not they have full
command of their wits anc capabilities.)
