As I have said before and I shall repeat one more time.
Your question to me is related to my statement commenting
on a statement from Maurizio13.
If you dont have a clue or understanding about Maurizio13
statement, then how on earth are you
going to know if my comment on Maurizio13 statement is logically
flawed?
I am sure you wont try to solve an maths equation without
first reading and understanding question and instruction isnt
it?
I will answer this. This is a good question.
Since u distrust me...u should trust the book" Discrete
mathematics by susanna 3rd edition"
Read pg 29..."A valid argument is that the truth follows
inescapably by the logical
form alone from the truth of the premises"
Pg 38...."The most important thing to note is that validity is a
property of argument
forms."
Pg 30...teaches u about truth tables and argument forms.
Pg 33 ...teaches rules of inference.
last but not least...pg41-43 some exercises for u to
practice to convince urself.
U see...I can dont know the truth of ur variables..ur premises.
But from ur argument FORM... we can with certainty guranteed by
mathematics to tell u that a certain form of argument is of wrong
logic.
The words lie in "ARGUMENT FORM".
How do mathematicans prove theorems??? They do not even need to know what it is
talking about. They just use law of deduction reasoning..correct
argument forms.
That is why MATH IS SO POWERFUL.
