UNCERTAIN, PLEASE DONT BE
A COWARD BY AVOIDING MY QUESTION IN RED.
Ok.. O o O o apparently ur selective reading disorder has occurred
again.
This is your question right:
So now my question to you is, how can you justify to IRAS to split 50%
of the SP company's income (or Personal income since its a SP
company) with someone who never existed in the company during that
last financial year?
So my ans is:
U CLAIM IRAS NEEDS REASONS FOR
STOCK SPLITS... GIVE ME EVIDENCE TO SUBSTANTIATE UR
POINT.
Sorry hor, I won't stand by my com every sec for ur reply
ok, I got things to do... so dun quote people "Coward" when they
dun bother to pay attention to ur nonsense.
Uncertain,
1) After all that talk about FRS 10.8 I am surprise that you
didnt even use that to justify your arguement. Isnt that the
first TOOLS you pull out to "impress"
us?
2) This is the
exact statement I made,
So now my question to you is,
how can you justify for IRAS to split 50% of the
SP company's income
(or Personal
income since its a SP company) with someone
who never existed in the company during that last financial
year?
As you can see, after realising that he has no FACTS to support
what he said, he is now using what I call
selective highlighting and reading
technique to TWIST and
CHANGE what I am saying just to create
something out of nothing.
Isnt it obvious that my statement about is talking about
splitting 50% of INCOME and not splitting
shares.
And guess what, he is now using
the word STOCK, as if the Sole Proprietor has transform
to be a public listed company..
And btw, the term Stock Split is different from
splitting shareholding and you need to get your FACTS right before
coming here to big talk and make a fool out of yourself.
If you are bloody color blind and you cant read text
written in black, then I will forgive you for sprouting so much
nonsense.
However if you are doing this hoping that we are
blind, then I must say that you are really pathatic. I REPEAT,
PATHETIC, especially coming from someone who talk so big about
Financial Reporting Standards lah, Busines Law lah, NTU lah,
Headhunted by international banks lah. All that are simply
desperate attempt
to glorify himself without knowing that it make him look like a
bloody wanker.
SO MR. WANKER, TELL ME
WHICH PART OF MY STATEMENT TALK ABOUT STOCK OR SHARE
SPLIT?
PLEASE ANSWER ME, YOU PATHETIC
FOOL!!