Sure, lets talk about logic.
Singapore current inflation is (x) 7% and Q208 private
property price grew at a rate of (y) 0.2%. So based on your believe that y = g(x,z), and f(x) = g(x,z).means y =
f(x) and it is guranteed by laws of mathematics, can I
know what will be your investment decision to hedge
against inflation? Would you invest in property?
Or you need to figure out what are the 10 or
20 variable beside x and y?
Academic maths are static, investment and economic
conditions are dynamic, so please dont try to impress me with you
maths when we are talking about economic.
Dont get me wrong and dont put words in my mouth. I never said
what was highlighted red. I said if f(x) can be used to represent
y, then z must be a variable dependent on x and the space
containing z can be span by the basis of the space of x.
Dont duan4 zhang1 qu3 yi4. I said law of mathematics in
logic can gurantee a certain form of argument is logically correct,
not in governing dynamics. Governing dynamics is a tough area of
research.
I have never even state any comment about me bing an expert in
real estate etc...in fact in my earlier post , I declare myself as
a noob in real estate.
My argument with u is ur use of argument structure is
wrong...nothing else.
Ur deduction of having other
variables to disclaim the existence of a certain variable is
logically wrong....hence cannot be used as an effective argument.
That is all I want to say.
U simply dont understand my point of argument and u started
treating me as a threat and put all kind of nonsense in my mouth.
Be objective....I am not trying to disclaim ur other variables as
nonsense...I am only trying to discredit ur logically flawed
argument form.
