Sequences of
the case
1.''Application decisions (of Stanford Summer programme)
will be available no later than the first week of March, 2008''(Stanford web
site)
2.But she applied on 17 June to OA for
travel.(http://www.zaobao.com/sp/sp080801_513.shtml)
3.OA rejetced her for second appeal and reply dated 11
July.
4.Stanford's offer of honorarium was dated 22 July.
Pl read my posting below.
4.CSC posted 3 postings dated July 23,25 and 28.
On 23 July posting,she pretended that she did not know the
offer of honorarium dated 22 July.
@@@@@@@@@@@@
What was CSC's, Chee Siok Chin,
game plan in application to OA for travelling to Stanford?
Why did she apply so late on 17
June,3 months after the scheduled
notification of decision ''no later than the
first week of
March''?
What is the game plan of CSC in the application for
attending
Stanford
I found the incident is fishy on the timing of postings
and the dates of events and letters.
Chee Siok Chin---SDP Leader and possible SG leader,
managing US$300 billions in net assets under Temasek and
GIC!!
Can we trust her with our futures?
Has she just told us one side of the coin,again?
She posted 3 postings dated July 23,25 and 28.
A.Did CSC
purposely delay lodging of
the application or OA purposely delaying approval of the
applications
for travel?OA and Ministry of Laws shall adopt a proactive
role
to counter the claims of wrongful refusal,and delay ,if any.
(PS__She applied on 17 June!!)
B.When CSC
posted the 23 July posting,did she know
the fact
that Stanford alreday sent the letter about
the
US$2,000 honoroium ,dated 22 July, to Minister of Laws
?Did she pretend not aware of the honorarium
when she posted 23 July posting?
FACTS
1.Screen
1
In a posting dated 23 July
Wed,CSC said he appealed to Minister
of Laws after OA refused her application to Stanford Summer
Fellows
on Democracy and Development,which will be held
July 28 - August 15.A
invitaion letter from Stanford was posted there.
This invitation letter shall be not later than first week of
March,acording
to the Stanford Summer Fellows web.
http://cddrl.stanford.edu/fellowships/summerfellows
Application decisions will be available no later than the
first week of March, 2008.
(PS__She applied on 17
June!!)
In this posting,CSC just complained OA refusal based on
But now the OA says that "none of these travels have translated
into a benefit to your creditors" and rejected her application to
go to Standford.
Then she posted the followings to indicate further the
refusal based
on no monetary benefits on her creditor,ie Singapore governments
.
The Ministry responded thus: "We regret to inform you that the
decision to reject your travel application remains. The OA is not
persuaded that your attendance at the fellowship program in
Stanford University would result is any substantial additional
benefit to your creditors."
According to her 2nd posting,the reply from OA on her 2nd
appeal
was dated 11 July 2008.Pl take note on this date.see C below for
link.
So,in this posting dated 23
July,CSC gave impression that she did not aware the
honorarium of US$2,000 that
Stanford Summer Fellows would give
her for a lectuer and OA refusal
based on no monetary benefits to
creditor.
I think she wanted to impress reader that if she can prove her
Stanford
travel could give monetary benefits to creditor,OA shall allow
her
application.If OA further refuse her application upon her
proof
of monetary benefits,she can darken name of SG one more
time.
http://www.yoursdp.org/index.php/news/singapore/1-singapore/690-govt-bans-chee-siok-chins-from-attending-leadership-program-at-stanford
2.Screen
2
True enough.Stanford offered honorarium of US$2,000 for her
to
give a lectuer in the Summer Fellows.OA still refused her
application
despite this US$2,000 bait which CSC said would pay to SG
governemnt.
No hurry.I will say my stand on her application.
But i will like draw your
attention on the date of offer of this US$2,000
honorarium.U can read from
link B below that the offer of
honorarium was dated
22 July
!!
This proved that when CSC posted her 23 July posting ,in link
B,
she already known the offer of
honorarium!!But she
pretended not aware
of the
offer.What is her purposes on doing
this?
Dates of
events and letters
Stanford shall give decision '' no later than the first week of
March, 2008.''
When did CSC apply for travel and did OA give reply?
It seems from link B that Minister of Laws gave his reply on 11
July
and then Stanford's offer of honorarium came on 22 July.
CSC posted first posting on 23 July,pretending not aware of
the offer of honorarium.Then,in her 25 July posting,
she pretended she just know the new
offer and that honorarium shall make
SG gavamna allow her travel.
A.http://www.yoursdp.org/index.php/news/singapore/1-singapore/690-govt-bans-chee-siok-chins-from-attending-leadership-program-at-stanford
B.http://www.yoursdp.org/index.php/news/singapore/1-singapore/713-stanford-university-writes-to-minister-over-cscs-case-
C.http://www.yoursdp.org/index.php/news/singapore/1-singapore/729-govts-excuse-banning-chee-siok-chins-travel-exposed-
Shall gavaman
allow her travel?
She alreday travelled few times after declared bankcrupt.
US$2,000 is just money not enough!!Is there any banker's
gurantee
for this 2 grains?What if she dunt pay after the trip,saying
i alreday buying books on democracy and freedom of
expressions?
3.Will her
attendance help SG?
The purposes of the workshop
who will play important roles in their country's political,
economic, and social development. We anticipate recruiting a group
of 25-30 individuals dedicated to democracy, development and rule
of law promotion within their home countries
Do u think she fit the bill?
4.Stanfor's
letter is very stupid
It talked about CSC's freedom and said:
the opportunity to enhance her knowledge and skills in ways that
will benefit Singapore and
also improve her professional capacity, including her ability to
earn income in the future.
see link B.What is the points of grooming one who will soon
cannot run for election?
