You think he will answer you?
Let him focus on his "restricted interest" and "repetitive
behaviour" first la
Eagle, please try to stay focus
and dont get carried away by all the small talk with all the empty
vessel in this forum.
Can you back up what you said with
facts and to prove to us that you are right to make the
following statement?
1) It is more cost effective for
government to give out money to people
using age class instead of income class.
2) You claim that company can
benefit from employing housewife to do nothing.
3) You claim that company can
pay employee only CPF contribution and not salary
4) You claim that it is not
illegal to evade tax by employing dummy employee to that does
nothing.
eagle, you are honoured. Everyone of us is
empty vessel, he only wants to engage discussion with
you. ROFL.
