U also have to look back. I am saying tat the needy and old
people r taken care of by the gov. However u insist the current
practise is not good and wanna give the money to the rich old
people as well
It is the tax cheat law. U know the tip top curry puff boss who
had to go to jail for cheating the tax ? He claim he made no profit
from the store and off to the jail he goes
I think u need to know there r differences bet graduates. Some
got first class some got merit some got just pass. U r
assuming just because he is a graduate he should have equal job
opportunity which is wrong.
Is only about a month where ten thousands people graduate. Give
it some time for the market to adjust itself first
R u from the school of NBS ? Because the 90% is based on
people from there
When the economy is bad, the FT comes in lesser number.
I have also been around europe and frankly speaking I have faced
more rude people there than my years in singapore.
U also have to look back. I am saying tat the needy and old
people r taken care of by the gov. However u insist the current
practise is not good and wanna give the money to the rich old
people as well
In which my argument is that it is more cost effective to give
every old folk, including the rich old folks who have had
significant contributions to Singapore. You are the one who keep
telling me it is already in place when I am telling you they
shouldn't have it.
This is a 100% assured safety net for the old folks, not some
dubious means testing which also rewards rich old folks who likes
to stay in 4rm HDBs.
It is the tax cheat law. U know the tip top curry puff boss who
had to go to jail for cheating the tax ? He claim he made no profit
from the store and off to the jail he goes
You are comparing to giving a large amount of money to parents
whom you should already give, vs employing someone to do nothing.
You have yet to raise any law to tell me it is illegal to employ
someone to do nothing, and whom can "return" the salary to the
boss.
I think u need to know there r differences bet graduates. Some
got first class some got merit some got just pass. U r
assuming just because he is a graduate he should have equal job
opportunity which is wrong.
Job opportunities does not correlate back to results. People
with a mindset like yours have lousier job opportunities.
Is only about a month where ten thousands people graduate. Give
it some time for the market to adjust itself first
Still the same thing. You raised an article on people being
employed months
before graduation. And now you are telling me to
give the market some time. Make up your mind please.
R u from the school of NBS ? Because the 90% is based on
people from there
Glad that you realise the statistic you posted does not refer to
the general population.
When the economy is bad, the FT comes in lesser number.
When I came into my engineering company (MNC), including me,
there were 5 newcomers. 3 were Singaporeans, and 2 foreigners. The
3 Singaporeans were offered employments at least 1 to 2 years ago,
and not the foreigner. In addition, it has been said that they are
not hiring any newcomers (to NUS/NTU) at that time.
I have also been around europe and frankly speaking I have faced
more rude people there than my years in singapore.
But as a foreigner, and especially if you are working there,
were you rude to them? Not to mention that they have their fair
share of PRCs, and that they cannot distinguish between you and
them. I admit there are nice people from PRC, but not 100% are.
Next, PRCs are still considered a minority here, vs you being the
minority there in Europe.
It must have costed you a big bomb if you have been around
Europe, having claimed you earned <3k a month.
