Excwees me deathmaster...
You got go read that thread your dear hero 787180 started ?
You got see what the wife of that "Adrian" was awarded anot har
?
That Adrian's case was only 3 years ago hor.
The wife is earning more than the Adrian hor.
The Adrian in the end only pay $400 for his child expense hor .
And he insist he shouldn't have to pay wor.
The wife don't get the alimony hor.
The wife also didn't get the flat hor.
She also got Thalasimia hor. Now Adrian is living in the flat
with is new wife hor.
But this 787180 still think the Women charter is unfair wor.
Ofcors maybe Adrian think he should make his ex-wife pay alimony
to him then is fair issit ? Looks like gold-diggers are not just
limited to women wor, even men can be just as greedy leh.
FYI this 787180 can be my lao peh ok ?
If it is his own choice to remain single.. then why is he kao
peh-ing about Women's Charter ?
Yes I also agree.. useless men should not be allowed to get
married.
You got go read that thread your dear hero 787180
started ?
yes. read ur subsequent post also.
You got see what the wife of that "Adrian" was awarded
anot har ?
she almost did, not for the fact that the rule for HDB sole flat
owner to be lowered to 35. and be logical. "ivy's" claim is crap.
trying to claim $3.6k when husband is only earning $1.5k. its dam
obvious that it doesn't add up.
and btw, assuming that she contributed zilch to the flat, i
stand by my argument that it's right for her not to be awarded a
share of the flat, since its paid by the guy and his families.
though she has a name-stake in the property, how much did she
actually contributed? nothing.
anyway, i believe that adrian was alr broke at the point of
time, (after paying for the caesarian fee, $200k, and at the same
time paying for flat.) i believe in 7's claim of $200k hospital
bill. my grandparent was admitted to sgh for leg fracture. she
stayed in class c ward for only 3 days, and the fee cost
over $25k. $25k for a comparatively simpler procedure,
and its not hard for me to believe the claim of $200k, in a
case whereby there's multiple complication in the patient. ie.
TM and caesarian.
That Adrian's case was only 3 years ago
hor.
The wife is earning more than the Adrian
hor.
The Adrian in the end only pay $400 for his child
expense hor . And he insist he shouldn't have to pay
wor.
why should he pay, when they don't even allow him to see his
kid? against the court order somemore.
also, since you had also previously agreed that both mothers and
fathers play an equally important role in the upbringing of a
child, don't you think it is unreasonable of the mother and her mum
to deny access to the father? since they are so unreasonable, why
be reasonable with them, and pay $400/ mnth? if they are so
reluctant against the child having any form of contact with her
dad, they may jolly well stay off contact with his money. and since
they didn't refuse the money, we can clearly see how selfish they
are. its all for the money. and with the mother earning more than
double the income of the husband, she can jolly well afford to
bring up a child on her own, without assistance.
yes, i do agree that its a father responsibility to look after
his child, and pay for his child upkeep too. but since the wife is
obviously violating the court order, he should also play hardball,
to force out access to his child (which is his right by the
way)
The wife don't get the alimony hor.
as i said, she nearly did, but too bad that she exceed her
boundary, asking for an unreasonable amount, asking for a sum which
her spouse clearly couldn't afford. if she keep to her limit,
there's no way the court wouldn't award her alimony.
and btw, it is also her who revealed her actual monthly wage of
$3600, in the same court hearing. she should have been arrested by
IRAS for mis-reporting on her wage instead, and somemore still dare
to make false accusation against her husband to IRAS. how
ironic.
The wife also didn't get the flat hor.
as mentioned above.
She also got Thalasimia hor. Now Adrian is living in the
flat with is new wife hor.
so what if she got a disease? you didn't sympathise with the
disabled man i mentioned in the previous thread, and why do you
expect me to do otherwise? and since that you mention it, custody
of a child should never be awarded to someone with a terminal
condition. she can die anytime, as you mentioned in the other
thread.
what if she die on the middle of the road, with her child beside
her? you want the child to be knock down by a vehicle? yes, if
she's healthy, and earns more than her husband, i don't see why she
shouldn't have custody of her child. but, she is diseased, and
living past her expected life expectancy, all the more likely she
might collapse anytime.
and from what i read, she needs regular blood transfusion. in
that case, will the child lead a lousier or better quality of life,
as compared to living with her father? and furthermore, if a mother
needs intensive care abt her own condition, is she fit to look
after others?
the child needs a healthy caregiver, and i assume the father is
healthy, since there's no mention of any illness. how about the
mother paying maintenance fee to the husband for looking after her
child?
But this 787180 still think the Women charter is unfair
wor.
it is unfair. purpledragon84 has said that there's unequal
treatment between men and women, as so implied in "if today
the law makes it [men and women] equal"
Ofcors maybe Adrian think he should make his ex-wife pay
alimony to him then is fair issit ? Looks like gold-diggers are not
just limited to women wor, even men can be just as greedy
leh.
so did he receive alimony? did he expect alimony? no.
yes, he may grumble about having to pay $400 per month,
especially when his wife barred him from his child. in the end, did
he pay? yes.
on the other hand, did the wife in the end allow him to see the
child? no.
do you call this reasonable? the unilateral attempt to cruelly
cut off the child's contact with her father, against the court
order. that is what people call "contempt of the court". last
heard, even the brother of the sultan of brunei was arrested for
that charge. and why wasn't she?
FYI this 787180 can be my lao peh ok ?
If it is his own choice to remain single.. then why is
he kao peh-ing about Women's Charter ?
maybe he's still single, because he is disgusted at the WC, and
the abuse of the WC by gold diggers, vengence wives etc?