In case you don't know, criminal conspiracy and abetment are
also crimes.
So where is your proof that the doctor is guilty or you suspect
that he is guilty? If you have proof to it, suggest you do your
part as a citizen and submit your evidence to the AG. Else, don't
go around groping in the dark making nonsensical claims.
So doctors has to do investigative work as private
investigator?
Is it part of the work of a doctor to do investigative work?
If you had read and understood the case, there was a transplant
ethics committee doing the review to assess the legality.
Surgeons do what they are good at doing, that is performing
surgery, imagine if a surgeon has to scrutinize every single case,
to do investigative work. Maybe you are suggesting that surgeons
employ private investigators to perform investigative work on the
case?
If you want to accuse someone of something, have some evidence
to support your claim, else you end up looking like CSJ
yelling at GCK.
If you really don't have any proof, suggest you stop making wild
accusations against doctors. If you have proof, please show it.
else you end up looking like CSJ yelling at GCK.
....
wow ... do I see a tiger changing his stripes ? .... from
someone who blames the goverment for all sorts of nonsensical
things before ? ... who's been precisely doing the same thing over
falling tree trunks and what not ? ... 
okie ... this is very simple, really .... listen carefully now
...
like I said previously, the only thing that saved the asses of
the doc, and the ethics committee ... are the declarations made by
the buyer and the seller ...
but, as we have seen, organ trading DID take place, that's why
all these court cases, no ? ....
now, we have someone found guilty of organ trading, and we have
seen that there appears to be a veritable organ trading industry
centered around singapore doctors in our neighbouring country ....
obviously, the ethics committee has failed to catch all of these,
regardless of whether the committee or the doctor was hoodwinked,
or not ... and THAT, is what we should be looking into ....
a doctor is no mere technician, a doctor deals in human lives,
by your logic, or rather, in your little universe, a doctor need
not care who he's removing the organs from, so long as his ass is
covered by that little piece of legal print and signatures that
covers his ass from legal reprecussions, in this case, the donor
was paid ... but HOTA and the ban on organ
transplant was designed precisely to prevent exploitation
of the poor and underprivileged, you read of those
cases in india and bangladesh were people are kidnapped and drugged
and wake up with a "U" shaped scar down one side of their torsos ?
... what if the donor was being blackmailed into donating his
kidney, what if the donor was forced to donate under duress ? ...
what if he was tricked ? .... but of course, in marizio's world, it
doesn't matter ... the doctor's got his ass covered with the
declaration, the ethics committee got his ass covered with the
declaration, so fark the donors, who cares, they can't be blamed
....
in that case, I think the docs, and the people on the ethics
committee, have not only failed in their profession, they have also
failed as human beings in my books.
And for you to say that everything is fine and dandy, that there
is nothing wrong, cos everything is "legal" (read: everyone's asses
is legally covered) .... then, in addition to your outlook in life
... i have found one more thing to wonder about you .....
your personal code of morals and ethics ...
go chew over that slowly ...
