In his latest blog entry, Mr Nair exposed the farcical
machinations of the PAP administration. His
trial was held in Court 6, Subordinate Courts, Singapore at 9.30 am
on Monday July 28, 2008. Readers may read the whole entry here:
http://singaporedissident.blogspot.com/2008/08/...
Here are some revealing excerpts for readers to consider.
1) The police could not provide evidence that Mr Nair knocked on
their police van.
“He then says he sent the fingerprints to the Criminal
Investigation Department for results and that they “were unable to
confirm that the fingerprints were mine” because, listen to this,
“they don’t have any records of the accused person”!”
-Excerpt from blog entry
That’s an outright lie – a lie told so badly that you just have
to laugh at the attempt! According to Mr Nair, the night he was
arrested, the police fingerprinted him at the station. All they
(the police) have to do now is to compare records, and if the
prints on the van were indeed Mr Nair’s, the police would end up
looking good in court. BUT they came up with
a lame “they don’t have any records of the accused person”. One has
to wonder why.
2) The phantom knocker
“Nair: You say that you saw a male Indian walk past your car.
Did you see that male Indian continuously and loudly knocking your
car?
Kang: No I did not.
Nair: Why is it that if someone continuously and loudly knocked
your car, while you were in the car, you do not know who it
was?
Kang: Your honor, I never saw, how do I know who it is?
Nair: Are you trying to say that you are inside a car; someone
knocks your car continuously and loudly. Why did you not turn to
look who it was?
Knag: When I heard someone knock the car, I only saw the male
Indian walk past the car, and therefore as such I cannot see who
knocked the car.”
-Excerpt from blog entry
Kang is one of the police officers involved in arresting Mr Nair
on the 4th of July. According to his court testimony, he
DID NOT see Mr Nair knocking on the police
van. And he said ‘I only saw the male Indian walk past the car, and
therefore as such I cannot see who knocked the car’. Was it a
Freudian slip? Did he mean to say the male indian who walked past
his van (allegedly Mr Nair) and the phantom knocker were 2
different persons?
Singa Crew