Robert Mugabe, the President of Zimbabwe, presides over one
of the world’s richest minerals treasures, the Great Dyke region,
which cuts a geological swath across the entire land from northeast
to southwest. The real background to the pious concerns of the Bush
Administration for human rights in Zimbabwe in the past several
years is not Mugabe’s possible election fraud or his expropriation
of white settler farms. It is the fact that Mr. Mugabe has been
quietly doing business, a lot of it, with the one country which has
virtually unlimited need of strategic raw materials Zimbabwe can
provide—China. Mugabe’s Zimbabwe is, along with Sudan, on the
central stage of the new war over control of strategic minerals of
Africa between Washington and Beijing, with Moscow playing a
supporting role in the drama. The stakes are huge.
Zimbabwe’s President, Robert Mugabe is a very very bad man. This
we all know from reading the newspapers or hearing the
pronouncements of George W. Bush, earlier Britain’s Tony Blair and
more recently Gordon Brown. In their eyes he has sinned badly. They
charge that he is a dictator; that he has expropriated, often with
violence, the farms of whites as part of land reform; they claim he
rigged his re-election by vote fraud and violence; that he has
ruined the economy of Zimbabwe.
Whether Robert Mugabe deserves to be in Washington’s honor roll
of villains alongside Fidel Castro, Saddam Hussein, Milosevic,
Ahmadinejad, and Adolf Hitler, however, it is not the reason
Washington and London have made Zimbabwe regime change priority
number one for their Africa policy.
What his sin is seems to have more to do with his attempts to
get out from under Anglo-American neo-colonial serfdom dependency
and to pursue a national economic development independent of the
International Monetary Fund and World Bank. His real sin seems to
be the fact that he has turned to the one nation that offers his
government credits and soft loans for economic development with no
strings attached—The Peoples’ Republic of China.
Western media accounts conveniently tend to omit the second
major party to what is a huge tug of war between Anglo-American
interests and China to get control of Zimbabwe’s vast mineral
wealth. We should keep in mind that for Washington there are always
"good dictators" and "bad dictators." The difference is whether the
given dictator serves US national interests or not. Mugabe clearly
is in the latter category.
Cecil Rhodes’ legacy
Zimbabwe is the name of what under the era of British
Imperialism a century ago was named Rhodesia. The name Rhodesia
came from the British imperial strategist and miner, Cecil Rhodes,
founder of the Rhodes scholarships to Oxford, and author of a plan
for a vast private African zone, to be chartered from the Queen of
England, from Egypt to South Africa. Cecil Rhodes created the
British South Africa Company, modeled on the East India Company,
along with his partner, L. Starr Jameson of Jameson Raid notoriety,
to exploit the mineral riches of Rhodesia. It controlled what was
later named Northern Rhodesia (Zambia) and Southern
Rhodesia-Nyasaland. The model was that the British Government would
assume all risks to militarily defend Rhodes’ looting while Rhodes
and his London bankers, above all Lord Rothschild, who was a close
associate, would assume all the gains of the business.
Rhodes, a seasoned geologist, knew well that there was a
remarkable geological fault running from the mouth of the Nile at
the Gulf of Suez south through Sudan, Uganda, Tanzania, down
through today’s Zimbabwe on to South Africa. Rhodes had already
instigated several wars to gain control of the diamonds of Kimberly
and the gold of Witwatersrand in South Africa. This geological
phenomenon he, as well as enterprising German explorers, had
discovered in the 1880’s. They named it the Great Rift Valley.
Rhodesia, like South Africa after the bloody Boer wars, was
settled by white settlers to secure future minerals gains for
allied interests of the City of London, mainly those of the
powerful Oppenheimer family and their gold and diamond enterprises
in the region.
In 1962 when Africa was undergoing the wave of national
liberation from colonial rule, a wave calculatedly supported by
"non-colonial power" Washington, Rhodesia was one of the last
bastions, along with former British colony South Africa, of white
Apartheid rule. Whites in Rhodesia constituted only 1-2% of the
total population so their methods of holding on to power were
rather ruthless.
White supremacist Prime Minister, Ian Smith, declared Rhodesian
independence from Britain in 1965 rather than agree to the
slightest compromise on race or power sharing with black
nationalists. Britain got UN trade sanctions imposed to force Smith
to buckle under. Despite sanctions, there was considerable support
from conservative business interests in London. Britain’s Tiny
Rowland, head of the Lonrho mining conglomerate, secured the bulk
of his African profits from Rhodesian copper mining and related
ventures under the Smith regime. The City of London knew very well
what riches lay in Rhodesia. The question was how to secure
enduring control. Smith’s Rhodesian backers had little interest in
giving it all to London.
Following a long and bloody struggle, in 1980 the leader of the
black African Popular Front coalition, Robert Mugabe,
overwhelmingly won election as the first Prime Minister of a new
Zimbabwe. Twenty eight years later, the same Robert Mugabe is under
escalating attack from the West, especially Zimbabwe’s former
colonial master, England, including strong economic sanctions
designed to bring the country to the brink of collapse, to force
him to open the economy to foreign (read Anglo-American and allied)
investment. Ironically, the issue seems not all that different from
the Ian Smith era: London and US control of the resources of the
rich land, and Zimbabwean efforts to resist that control.
The Great Dyke
Within Zimbabwe, a portion of the rich Great Rift is called the
Great Dyke, an intrusive geological treasure zone running over 530
kilometers from the northeast to the southwest of the country, in
places up to 12 kilometers wide. A river runs along the fault and
the region is volcanically active. Here also lie vast deposits of
chromium, of copper, platinum and other metals.
The US State Department, as well as
London, is aware of the vast minerals and other riches of Zimbabwe.
It states in a recent report on Zimbabwe,
"Zimbabwe is endowed with rich mineral resources. Exports of gold,
asbestos, chrome, coal, platinum, nickel, and copper could lead to
an economic recovery one day...The country is richly endowed with
coal-bed methane gas that has yet to be exploited.
With international attractions
such as Victoria Falls, the Great Zimbabwe stone ruins, Lake
Kariba, and extensive wildlife, tourism historically has been a
significant segment of the economy and contributor of foreign
exchange. The sector has contracted sharply since 1999, however,
due to the country's declining international image.(sic).
Energy Resources
With considerable hydroelectric
power potential and plentiful coal deposits for thermal power
station, Zimbabwe is less dependent on oil as an energy source than
most other comparably industrialized countries, but it still
imports 40% of its electric power needs from surrounding
countries--primarily Mozambique. Only about 15% of Zimbabwe's total
energy consumption is accounted for by oil, all of which is
imported. Zimbabwe imports about 1.2 billion liters of oil per
year. Zimbabwe also has substantial coal reserves that are utilized
for power generation, and coal-bed methane deposits recently
discovered in Matabeleland province are greater than any known
natural gas field in Southern or Eastern Africa. In recent years,
poor economic management and low foreign currency reserves have led
to serious fuel shortages."
In short, chrome, copper, gold, platinum, huge hydroelectric
power potential and vast coal reserves are what is at stake for
Washington and London in Zimbabwe. The country also has unverified
reserves of uranium, something in big demand today for nuclear
power generation.
It is clear of late that so long as the tenacious Mugabe is
running things, not the Anglo-Americans, but rather the Chinese,
are Zimbabwe’s preferred business partners. This seems to be
Mugabe’s greatest sin. He’s not reading from the right program as
George W. Bush’s friends see it. His real sin seems to be turning
East not West for economic and investment help.
The Chinese connection
During the Cold War China recognized and supported Robert
Mugabe. In recent years as China’s search for secure raw materials
escalated its foreign diplomacy, relations have become stronger.
According to the Chinese media, China has invested more in Zimbabwe
than any other nation.
Already back in July 2005 as Tony Blair turned the sanctions
screws tighter on Zimbabwe, Mugabe flew to Beijing to meet with the
top Chinese leadership, where he reportedly sought an emergency
loan of US$1 billion and asked increased Chinese involvement in the
economy.
It began to bear fruit. In June 2006 state--owned Zimbabwean
businesses signed a number of energy, mining and farming deals
worth billions of dollars with Chinese companies. The largest was
with China Machine-Building International Corporation, for a $1,3bn
contract to mine coal and build thermal-power generators in
Zimbabwe, to reduce Zimbabwe’s electricity shortage. The Chinese
company had already built thermal-power stations in Nigeria and
Sudan, and had been involved in mining projects in Gabon.
In 2007 the Chinese government donated farm machinery worth $25
million to Zimbabwe, including 424 tractors and 50 trucks, as part
of a $58 million loan to the Zimbabwean government. The Mugabe
administration had previously seized white-owned farms and gave
them to blacks, damaging machinery in the process. In return for
the equipment and the loan the Zimbabwean government will ship 30
million kilograms of tobacco to the People's Republic of China.
Other Zimbabwe-China agreements included a deal between the
Zimbabwe Mining Development and China’s Star Communications,
forming a joint venture to mine chrome, with funding from the China
Development Bank. Zimbabwe also agreed to import road-building,
irrigation and farming equipment from the China National
Construction and Agricultural Machinery Import and Export
Corporation and China Poly Group. Zimbabwe also relies on China for
imports of telecommunications equipment, military hardware and many
other critical items it can no longer import from the west because
of the British-led sanctions.
Relations have become so important that Zimbabwe’s police have a
dedicated "China desk" to protect Chinese interests in the
country.
In April 2007 the chairman of China’s top political advisory
body, Jia Qinglin, head of the National Committee of the Chinese
Peoples’ Political Consultative Conference, flew to Harare to meet
with Mugabe. It was a follow-up to the 2006 Beijing China-Africa
Cooperation Summit where the Chinese government invited the heads
of more than 40 African states to discuss relations. Africa has
become a diplomatic and economic priority for China and its
economy.
At that time, Beijing got an open invitation to help develop
dormant mines in the country. The deputy speaker of Zimbabwe's
parliament called for more Chinese investment in the country's
mining sector, according to China's Xinhua news agency. Zimbabwe's
mining laws were changed to allow the government to reallocate
mining claims that were not being exploited.
Mining generates half of Zimbabwe's export revenue. It is the
only sector in the country that still has foreign investors after
the collapse of the main agricultural sector. Western companies
with mining claims in Zimbabwe were not exploiting them. "We would
appeal to the Chinese government to come in full force to exploit
these minerals," Zimbabwean Deputy Parliamentary Speaker, Kumbirai
Kangai said to the official Xinhua.
Kangai assured potential Chinese investors that they would not
expose themselves to legal action if they took over claims held by
Western companies.
A few months after, in December 2007, Chinese company, Sinosteel
Corporation, acquired 67 percent stake in Zimbabwe's leading
ferrochrome producer and exporter Zimasco Holdings. Zimasco
Holdings is the fifth largest high carbonated ferrochrome producer
in the world. It used to produce 210,000 tons of high-carbon
ferrochrome per year, nearly all of it along the mineral-rich Great
Dyke, accounting for 4 percent of global ferrochrome
production.
Zimasco has also the world's second largest reserves of chrome,
after South Africa. It was formerly owned by Union Carbide
Corporation, now part of Dow Chemicals Corp.
Oh, oh! Alarm bells went ringing in London and in Washington at
that news.
China clearly views Africa as a central part of its strategic
plan, most notably for its oil reserves and vital raw materials
such as copper, chrome, nickel. The continent is also at the same
time becoming an important region for Chinese manufactured exports.
But the raw materials battle is at the heart, and the real reason
by all accounts, why Washington recently decided to form a separate
Africa Command in the Pentagon.
Controlling China’s economic emergence is an un-stated strategic
priority of United States foreign and military policy and has been
since before September 11, 2001. The only delicate point in the
business is the fact that China, with well over $1.7 trillions of
foreign exchange reserves, most believed in form of US Treasury
securities, could trigger a complete dollar panic and further
collapse of the US economy should she decide for political reasons
it were too risky to continue holding its hundreds of billions of
US dollar debt. In effect, by buying US Government debt with its
trade surpluses, China has been indirectly financing US policies
counter to Chinese national interest such as the Iraq war, or even
the $100 million or so annually that Condi Rice’s State Department
spends on Tibet.
China is refusing to play by the rules of the Anglo-American
neo-colonial game. It does not seek IMF or World Bank approval
before dealing with African countries. It makes soft loans,
regardless who might be running the country. In this it does
nothing different from Washington or London. The Chinese see
American influence in Africa less entrenched than in the rest of
the world, thus offering unique opportunities for China to pursue
its economic interests.
It may or may not be cynical. It may be Realpolitik. If it
results in the ability of certain African countries to use China as
a political counterweight to the one-sided Anglo-American
domination of the Continent, that itself could be a major benefit
to Africans depending on how they use it.
Clearly, it has been extremely positive for Chinese access to
vital economic minerals for its economy as well as oil from places
such as Darfur and southern Sudan, or Nigeria.
Mineral wealth has once more put Africa on center stage of a
battle for mineral riches between East and West. This time, unlike
during the Cold War era, however, Beijing is playing with far more
assets, and Washington with far less.
http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=9707
http://www.engdahl.oilgeopolitics.net