Singapore may legalise the trade in
human kidneys for transplants, its health minister said.
The Health Ministry is considering paying unrelated donors to
boost the supply of organs, Khaw Boon Wan said.
"We should not reject any idea just because it is radical or
controversial," Khaw said. "We may be able to find an acceptable
way to allow a meaningful compensation for some living, unrelated
kidney donors, without breaching ethical principles or hurting the
sensitivities of others."
Khaw said the ministry would review possible changes to current
legislation to allow payments for donations from third parties such
as those from the charity and religious sectors. Under the
proposal, which would need to be approved by Parliament to become
law, patients would also get help in finding donors.
"There are desperate patients out there wishing to live and
desperately poor people willing to exchange a kidney for a
hopefully improved life," he said. "Criminalising organ trading
does not eliminate it...it merely breeds a black market."
Khaw also said the Health Ministry would push to amend existing
laws on organ transplants to remove an age limit on deceased
donors, currently set at 60 years, because "the suitability of the
organ depends on its condition rather than the age of the
donor."
The two initiatives should enable Singapore to carry out 70% of
the kidney transplants needed every year - up from 50% currently,
the minister said.
Khaw's comments follow the cases of two Indonesian men who were
jailed and fined by a Singapore court earlier this month after
being convicted of agreeing to sell their kidneys to two
patients.
Selling or buying organs or blood is illegal in Singapore, as in
many other countries, and carries a penalty of up to 12 months'
jail.
©
The Press Association
<We may be able to find an acceptable way to allow a
meaningful compensation for some living, unrelated kidney donors,
without breaching ethical principles or hurting the sensitivities
of others.">
how can they assure us that there will be no breaching of
ethical principles when they only charged and fined the sellers and
not the buyer, surgeon/s and hospital in the recent organ selling
case?