How pathetic that you can only
count the number of questions but could not go beyond the numbers
?
Were you still fixated by the
'under cover piece' from your friend's sister, and unable to sniff
deeper into the text ?
The reply remains the same
:-
Were Singaporeans not owning
cars before the PAP came into the political scene ?
Are you suggesting that the wealth
accumulated by Singaporean created by the government, and not by
the sheer ingenuity of ordinary Singaporeans in the face of the
constant assault on the wallets of Singaporeans ?
Are cars becoming affordable today
then compared to 1970s - before taxes were raised 300% - bringing
car selling prices for a 160cc from $15,000 to $60,000 ?
Is the Singapore
population growing by natural birth, or by the opening of
doors to new immigrants ?
How much land can Singapore
recover from the sea - given the perimeter border that surround
Singapore island ?
Have all other options been
considered in building road ways above and below the surface roads
?
What about the large tracts of
land that remain held in the land bank to be sold at the pleasure
of the URA on instructions from the Ruling Party ?
Has the Master Plan considered the
longer term development of traffic flows, and update the Traffic
Police in modernising its own mindsets in road speed management
?
How do you intend to push your
line of argument ?
Are you suggesting that the
Government will build infrastructure for public transportation for
the altruistic purpose of Singaporean drivers ?
Has it not been a fact that the
Government has failed in getting the maximum benefit from the
amount of monies spent on the LTA designed infrastructural
development of expressways and arterial roads, and leaving the
Traffic Police to curtail the designed speed with nonsensical speed
limits and speed cameras that cause bottle necks to occur in an
otherwise perfectly designed road system ?
If it has not been the initiative
and intelligence of Singaporean drivers to ignore the speed limits
and drive safely - can the Singapore economy hum at the
restricteed speed limits imposed by the conservative and
paternalistic Traffic Police ?
As matters stand, at least 90% of
Singaporeans are already traffic offenders for exceeding the
unrealistic speed limits of most roads in Singapore, except
that the police were not around.
If you want the readers to believe
that the government has generous and responsive in spending on
infrastructure and make cars to be "affordable" by tweaking the COE
- you must be deluded to believe that these policies are all done
with charity towards Singaporeans.
If at all, the lowering of the COE
per car will result in a boost in revenues from a frantic chase to
nab the restricted quantities of COE that are available; and the
billions spent on infrastruture roadways will mean that
more cars will move around more frequently to add more
ERP revenue to the Finance Ministry, as well as more revenue
from the fuel taxes collected.
Only a mixed up juvenile that
cannot even come up with a straight nick will not be able to
discern the obvious strategic thinking of a sly
government.
That's Gazelle's tactic. He's just an attention seeking troll.
Just look at the attention-seeking threads he has created:
7 Signs That You're Living in
Denial
Time Start Thinking Investing Stock by
AndrewPKYap
One can immediately see how pathetic he is.
