At least some of the "off-duty" Gurkhas had the guts
to protests - supposedly over some remuneration issues.
Are the Gurkhas paid according to the remuneration scheme
available to Singapore Police Force, or are the Gurkhas treated
poorly by the Singapore Government - with a lower wage scheme
that is paid and being similar to the practices of the UK Armed
Forces in its treatment of their Gurkhas ?
The Gurkhas in the UK Military had also raised issues with the
UK Ministry of Defense with regards to their entitlements, and to
available opportunities to them to retire in the UK as
subjects of the Crown.
Surely, this is not part of the contract with our Gurkhas in the
Singapore Police ?
Comparing with the courage of the Gurkhas and some of the
gutless display from some SgForum participants - will anyone
in the SAF stand up to any unfair treatment, or even the
compensation issues, or the medical care issues offered to SAF
personnel who are injured in the course of their duties ?
Singaporeans have been brought up to believe that we must be
obedient, not to protest, depend on ourselves, and if there
are any complaints - to do so through a formal channels.
Now it seems those Gurkhas who had participated in the protests
are facing disciplinary actions for protesting inside their camp -
even when they were "off-duty".
The "Red Trucks" were present at Mount Vernon Camp during the
"disturbance".
Did our boys in Red-Beret managed to scare the Gurkhas, or were
the kukris drawn to intimidate the Red-Berets from entering the
Camp ?
If we must outsource the the defence of Singapore to
mercenaries, we had better learn from this experience of
"the Gurkha uprising" - that they are also thinking men.
Will MM LKY have second thoughts about their loyalty after this
incidents - that pile on to the Gurkha involvment in the MSK escape
due to lapses in their attention ?
Who on earth can MM LKY trust now ?