Take your pick......
CNN, BBC, CNB, Fox News..... etc
Any China's media.... which is largely Mouth piece for the
Chinese Govt.......
All are for their own agenda..... same as you when you
'Alerted' us to that SINA website......
Do you know why I had to
"Alert", especially people like you about alternative voices
besides those propaganda that you had seen in western
media?
Simple:
fact 1:
Many had taken Western news and
journalism at face-value. All too often their presentation and
news-reporting are second-to-none. Very persuasive, very
captivating. Their global dominace allows them to turn
night-into-day. Much like "Iraqi freedom" stories. I had gone
thru that learning process before coming to realise their
sleek-media has more air than sustance over time.
fact 2:
The irony about the pervasiveness
news reporting is Chinese nationals now more than
ever have access to this (mis)inormation. They are the ones
who are able to see, read and determine who to trust based
on their personal experience of having live and worked
outside China.
Try an educated guess: How
many Westerners have ever attempted to read Chinese media's report?
Or ever know where is Tibet and Lhasa?
The answer is obvious
here.
I
don't think Chinese deserve any lesser voice than
those so-called "China-experts" or Sino-specialist that
we so-often read in western media.
So the question here is about
reporting accountability and reliability. The Chinese nationals had
seen both sides of the story.
But does typical Western
media provide "enough" information about Chinese' opinion
on Tibetan or Olympic protests by BBC or LA Times?
Nope.
Instead we get to hear
interesting remarks like "They are basically the same bunch of
goons and thugs as they were in the past 50 years." on
live-TV.
Who's propaganda do you subscript
to?
Go figure.
