Beware of the temptation to indulge in side effects like using
threats and insults to browbeat another into submission or
attempting to prove the superiority of one view over the other or
making fun of the other person or "educating" the other person into
adopting a common view are regrettable or being a comedian or
making the other person so angry they end up making fools of
themselves or derailing the subject to another or throwing lots of
questions to distract people or using emotional triggers.
Thank you for your comments. About incest, I and (i believe) the
mass majority of the people will feel something about it and
therefore i try to delink it with homosexual. On trying to use
insults and other methods, I always try to keep it to a minimum but
sometimes the comments made by other people r too
provocative.
This SIS is the worst. In his attempt to make sure all opposing
viewpoints [to his] are crushed, he spares no effort in knocking
down ALL of his opponent's points, without even reading the points
that are put across.
If I do not read their points, how can I cursh it 
Neither should you guys be so harsh on PRP, who is obviously
holding a minority view here.
He is not condemned because he is a minority. He is condemned
because his arguments and attitude suck. I used to be minority in
this thread before and it is not about minority
Contrary to what SIS thinks, incest law is there not mainly
because it will bring about defect children.
I have given my reasonings on the previous replies. It is not
just 1 reason but 3
Till now, SIS has avoided my question of why sex with HIV
patient is not criminalised, considering the rate at which it is
spreading. His reply that there should be mandatory divulging of
condition is nothing more than a red herring.
If both party consent to having sex even if one of them has
AIDs, I don't see why we should ban them from having sex
Notice SIS has not really answered my question. If homo is a
choice, should gays be criminalised? Using his logic, they should,
because they can choose not to do it, just like incest!
I have answer tis many times before. My answer is NO. U can read
back the replies I made before
And u r giving a totally hypothetical situation. We should look at
the present and the facts of the situation and not talk about "if"
cases. I can also ask a hypothetical question such as "if religion
is found to be the cause of most conflicts and eliminating religion
bring about great peace and prosperity to the world, should we ban
religion ?" Do u think u r asking a fair question ?
